From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LZvX0-0007L0-Fk for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 23:08:42 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 21B22E023C; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 23:08:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp-vbr19.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr19.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.39]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE052E023C for ; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 23:08:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from epia.jer-c2.orkz.net (atwork-106.r-212.178.112.atwork.nl [212.178.112.106]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp-vbr19.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n1IN8d6n025625 for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2009 00:08:40 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jer@gentoo.org) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 00:08:39 +0100 From: Jeroen Roovers To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] `paludis --info' is not like `emerge --info' Message-ID: <20090219000839.6cda50b1@epia.jer-c2.orkz.net> In-Reply-To: <20090218225506.14b91815@snowcone> References: <20090218232212.5452b86d@epia.jer-c2.orkz.net> <20090218225506.14b91815@snowcone> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.12.11; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner X-Archives-Salt: d5685b7b-e7fd-470c-b645-afbc43d6216f X-Archives-Hash: acbbf74f65007eeda67819563c5d110a On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 22:55:06 +0000 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > Heck, Paludis even tells you this if you run --info without a spec: > > > No packages were specified on the command line, so detailed > > information is not available (Paludis can display detailed > > information for both installed and installable packages). Apparently users aren't picking that up, which is why I started this thread. > Please try harder next time. Who? What? jer