From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LYqD3-00023w-Q2 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 23:15:38 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D25EEE0555; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 23:15:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ew0-f15.google.com (mail-ew0-f15.google.com [209.85.219.15]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A267E0555 for ; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 23:15:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy8 with SMTP id 8so1729970ewy.10 for ; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 15:15:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type; bh=TfZ7YDgLBsPE03AbGtL2oyjKoD82eaiR6L8zT8pWkpQ=; b=DQtbD8cRLpHNRQt/2ti5bHaifXGB84WOwZaXwsU6/tYSGT/y7VmE6toqUfbkjUbFFT WUbWIa5bZFEze4tdVjmG/Vwmrt+t/u3ZdPAz8cvNJi1RVxOwPZ2DDyylC00wigi3B2sP Xiil4NHfuRAhQIWNluf1Vkht5p3z9VDMe3FWw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; b=VBZSjCL+6KdGnsMmhYgRBu0Z7cpTf8k7WafwC3KM24xcdAdT59U1UJclyVD/mSaDzK PIP7VloCrdbqJ/PUtGuP4UfA7ry3fc2cq4boAzyn8p2sbnSHWwH80ckLh4o09L5t7ASb W8ZOYsyCrh8BhihSWy7Z/Q+omoJ782AKhybRg= Received: by 10.210.61.19 with SMTP id j19mr3103437eba.16.1234739735616; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 15:15:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from snowcone (92-235-187-79.cable.ubr18.sgyl.blueyonder.co.uk [92.235.187.79]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 24sm10996471eyx.54.2009.02.15.15.15.34 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 15 Feb 2009 15:15:35 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 23:15:27 +0000 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] DIGESTS metadata variable for cache validation Message-ID: <20090215231527.3dbc2cb6@snowcone> In-Reply-To: <49989C5E.3020307@gentoo.org> References: <498758E6.5080609@gentoo.org> <1234045916.24784.1373.camel@localhost> <498E17E6.8060407@gentoo.org> <49989C5E.3020307@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.14.7; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/kdycqZc+3xh7Ewd8iHkT+s5"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: b708cc25-ff65-4931-a7fe-05c30a383f67 X-Archives-Hash: d5df792bb0d1ea3a120947f6c86e0b4f --Sig_/kdycqZc+3xh7Ewd8iHkT+s5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 15 Feb 2009 14:51:10 -0800 Zac Medico wrote: > Regardless of what the EAPI value happens to be, the package manager > should be able to trust that the version identifier is a reliable > indicator of the mechanism which should be used to validate the > integrity of the cache entry. Validate it against what? If EAPI is unsupported, the package manager can't make use of INHERITED to see what DIGESTS means. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/kdycqZc+3xh7Ewd8iHkT+s5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkmYohIACgkQ96zL6DUtXhEBEACdFfbJfES8BJ2viqpjR/xORa63 lWcAn2a2Sl9r7lIXviu6XKFpERj68hQO =a3Vy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/kdycqZc+3xh7Ewd8iHkT+s5--