[gentoo-dev] GCC 4.3 patches will be applied nowish

[gentoo-dev] GCC 4.3 patches will be applied nowish

[Ryan Hill]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 772 bytes --]

All bugs blocking #198121 having obviously correct (eg. missing header)
patches will be applied by me in the coming week.  If you have concerns
about me touching your package (i swear i'll wash my hands first),
please let me know.

As always, applying these patches yourself makes me a happy monkey.

I'll try to have this done by the end of the week.  I will also handle
filing of stabilization bugs for these packages at the end of
February.

https://bugs.gentoo.org/showdependencytree.cgi?id=198121&max
depth=1&hide_resolved=1


-- 
gcc-porting,                                      by design, by neglect
treecleaner,                              for a fact or just for effect
wxwidgets @ gentoo     EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] GCC 4.3 patches will be applied nowish

[Jeremy Olexa]

On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 1:54 AM, Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@gentoo.org> wrote:
> All bugs blocking #198121 having obviously correct (eg. missing header)
> patches will be applied by me in the coming week.  If you have concerns
> about me touching your package (i swear i'll wash my hands first),
> please let me know.
>
> As always, applying these patches yourself makes me a happy monkey.
>
> I'll try to have this done by the end of the week.  I will also handle
> filing of stabilization bugs for these packages at the end of
> February.
>
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/showdependencytree.cgi?id=198121&max
> depth=1&hide_resolved=1

Ryan,
Surely, at this point we aren't going to let all those bugs hold up
gcc-4.3 stabilization? Most of which were only found via Diego's
tinderboxing which implies that no user cares enough about the package
to report a bug (or no one uses the package). I've been working on the
gcc-4.3 stabilzation tracker and all the bugs now have arches CC'd on
the bugs so, once the glibc-2.8 stab tracker is resolved (which Fauli
has been working on) I think we should be good to mark gcc-4.3 stable.

-Jeremy

Re: [gentoo-dev] GCC 4.3 patches will be applied nowish

[Serkan Kaba]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Jeremy Olexa yazmış:
> Surely, at this point we aren't going to let all those bugs hold up
> gcc-4.3 stabilization? Most of which were only found via Diego's
> tinderboxing which implies that no user cares enough about the package
> to report a bug (or no one uses the package).
That can also mean no user of the package upgraded to gcc 4.3 yet.
> 
> -Jeremy
> 
> 

- --
Sincerely,
Serkan KABA
Gentoo/Java
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkmR3mEACgkQRh6X64ivZaLeKwCfWawweD0qNm8hEmcP1Ca9pnJW
pM4Anif80hh+C/ETGb1FVYl0jNEyMBj/
=5DRm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[gentoo-dev] Re: GCC 4.3 patches will be applied nowish

[Ryan Hill]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1678 bytes --]

On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 13:51:14 -0600
Jeremy Olexa <darkside@gentoo.org> wrote:

> On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 1:54 AM, Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@gentoo.org>
> wrote:
> > All bugs blocking #198121 having obviously correct (eg. missing
> > header) patches will be applied by me in the coming week.  If you
> > have concerns about me touching your package (i swear i'll wash my
> > hands first), please let me know.
> >
> > As always, applying these patches yourself makes me a happy monkey.
> >
> > I'll try to have this done by the end of the week.  I will also
> > handle filing of stabilization bugs for these packages at the end of
> > February.
> >
> > https://bugs.gentoo.org/showdependencytree.cgi?id=198121&max
> > depth=1&hide_resolved=1
> 
> Ryan,
> Surely, at this point we aren't going to let all those bugs hold up
> gcc-4.3 stabilization? Most of which were only found via Diego's
> tinderboxing which implies that no user cares enough about the package
> to report a bug (or no one uses the package). I've been working on the
> gcc-4.3 stabilzation tracker and all the bugs now have arches CC'd on
> the bugs so, once the glibc-2.8 stab tracker is resolved (which Fauli
> has been working on) I think we should be good to mark gcc-4.3 stable.

I'm going through the list and marking anything that i think should
block stabilization as P1.  In the end though it's up to toolchain to
decide when they want to go ahead.


-- 
gcc-porting,                                      by design, by neglect
treecleaner,                              for a fact or just for effect
wxwidgets @ gentoo     EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]