From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LWWya-0005tc-JH for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 09 Feb 2009 14:19:09 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 442E1E0351; Mon, 9 Feb 2009 14:19:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.186]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2A58E0351 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2009 14:19:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id c7so401483nfi.26 for ; Mon, 09 Feb 2009 06:19:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type; bh=4mcGTimMsTI9Z0ShiFKdnqee3hV2VRuaZsTpiVj8VKw=; b=p50j2oqX4xjGlIIuDaZlTKI56Hoo3v3M6NVFFgv/PBuVhGnznzjUOaOlj0jUmSm82F VjA/pUbW8Cj0bm8isJwMQT7h3NG21I3BiE9+xgEYA/EXTbuwbhBlUC+T6MGbGcQeDZ/O wviBldj9Hg00K3VGF28uUAzz5k4M9yhaMTbK0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; b=mSnov+BcyG02+AlfhV548tJzFY0XuRFYppG6i3W6Sx1DovrSuj2b14lfGdR9KEJ8ly 68ZYlHLYmdtrGI/07RKOqtRvuj/aatNDAl4HMdlIFWtGD/rpKfE/8v8dItWJOhFIeAJv cYjen0QwSAfQCj34QZkceqBZSAaCHaQUeQg0Q= Received: by 10.210.125.13 with SMTP id x13mr3894482ebc.43.1234189146129; Mon, 09 Feb 2009 06:19:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from snowcone (92-235-187-79.cable.ubr18.sgyl.blueyonder.co.uk [92.235.187.79]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 7sm1695513eyb.28.2009.02.09.06.19.04 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 09 Feb 2009 06:19:05 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 14:18:58 +0000 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] DIGESTS metadata variable for cache validation Message-ID: <20090209141858.3d95fe66@snowcone> In-Reply-To: <49903A9B.5020601@gentoo.org> References: <498758E6.5080609@gentoo.org> <1234045916.24784.1373.camel@localhost> <498E17E6.8060407@gentoo.org> <20090208221814.722f573a@snowmobile> <498F5FF5.50203@gentoo.org> <20090208224721.4193ca45@snowmobile> <498F64D4.4080303@gentoo.org> <20090208231010.4b2ebe3b@snowmobile> <498F6A7A.2060408@gentoo.org> <20090208233008.6350dd40@snowmobile> <498F6D60.7080500@gentoo.org> <49902202.1080607@gentoo.org> <20090209135922.796d6256@snowcone> <49903A9B.5020601@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.14.7; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/VImg0IckGm3tnh_lWJCuMix"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: ba6e1a39-7e3d-4ee3-a928-f5bfb435e8ce X-Archives-Hash: def73d41d99afc6344cf215b94ec1b98 --Sig_/VImg0IckGm3tnh_lWJCuMix Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 09 Feb 2009 16:15:55 +0200 Petteri R=C3=A4ty wrote: > > How much do you trust overlay maintainers? >=20 > It shouldn't be that hard to sandbox the overlays for cache > generation. Uh. Really? I'd be interested to see how you plan to pull that one off. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/VImg0IckGm3tnh_lWJCuMix Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkmQO1UACgkQ96zL6DUtXhFKBACfa86wJoTEPa8eHnHaDuISKQf4 EHsAn39P0YP2Qb+z/Ei1da9lKU801D2w =KFp2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/VImg0IckGm3tnh_lWJCuMix--