From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LUQsr-0007m8-Sr for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 03 Feb 2009 19:24:34 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AEBA7E0507; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 19:24:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E048E0507 for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 19:24:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gentoo.org (xray.science.oregonstate.edu [128.193.220.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BBC26449C for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 19:24:32 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 11:24:31 -0800 From: Donnie Berkholz To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Announcement of The G Palmtop Environment ebuilds Message-ID: <20090203192431.GA3819@comet> References: <1233675279.6250.95.camel@localhost> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1233675279.6250.95.camel@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Archives-Salt: 8987b7b8-5729-4afd-b24e-aaefd0d3ff7e X-Archives-Hash: a627c38b8017b25e4c17ff4a599bbe99 --sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 15:34 Tue 03 Feb , Angelo Arrifano wrote: > We at -embedded would like to introduce GPE - The G Palmtop Environment. Hi, Very cool that you've been working on this! > We currently provide an eclass and ebuilds arranged by top level > categories following upstream categorization. Explicitly gpe.eclass and > top level gpe-base gpe-net gpe-pim gpe-games gpe-utils gpe-media > gpe-xsession. > We know we have a lot of them but upstream finds useful to classify them > like that and so do we. Could you expand on how each new category is useful? > The eclass and some ebuilds were based on bugzie #101393. We started > playing with them as big flat gpe-base category which evolved over time > by means of consecutive testing on ARMv5 handheld devices and needs. >=20 > Since we are maintaining this over half a year now, we think that its > time to finally starting moving step-by-step the GPE suite into the > portage tree - starting with the eclass and toplevel categories. What are the stats on package count per category? --=20 Thanks, Donnie Donnie Berkholz Developer, Gentoo Linux Blog: http://dberkholz.wordpress.com --sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkmIme8ACgkQXVaO67S1rtu8nACgv4eiWGPcT/fWZsdQeSTrCJ3o lnwAoPcFmfBN3WIyPEzaUY7qgu8RWz15 =wb/b -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c--