From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-34085-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1LQ3VU-0002NG-GL
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 22 Jan 2009 17:38:21 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A33CFE076C;
	Thu, 22 Jan 2009 17:38:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73CF9E076D
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 22 Jan 2009 17:38:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from gentoo.org (xray.science.oregonstate.edu [128.193.220.51])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E872A64746
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 22 Jan 2009 17:38:15 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 09:38:15 -0800
From: Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] One-Day Gentoo Council Reminder for January 22
Message-ID: <20090122173815.GD20446@comet>
References: <20090121233526.GA15870@comet> <20090122000229.GF15870@comet> <1232644991.4164.19.camel@homer.ob.libexec.de>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="g7w8+K/95kPelPD2"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1232644991.4164.19.camel@homer.ob.libexec.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
X-Archives-Salt: 1937fe11-3e76-45f0-8e68-0f7d51d800f7
X-Archives-Hash: 57dbe266da79cd939dc7c223fa241040


--g7w8+K/95kPelPD2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 18:23 Thu 22 Jan     , Tobias Scherbaum wrote:
> Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> > Discuss on-list before meeting
> > ---------------------------------------
> > - Council meta stuff (-council)
> >   - Can the size change? Minimum? Maximum?
> >   - Should we have 2-year staggered terms?
>=20
> I'm in favor of a fixed size of council members, I'd like to see at
> least 5 council members *if* developers want to change the size. I
> dislike the idea of stretched 2-year terms, instead I prefer having
> 1-year staggered terms (voting every 6 months and replace 3 or 4 council
> members). This would allow to put open council slots into the next
> election, we wouldn't need to hold extra elections for open slots then.
>=20
> Anyways, this is something we can discuss - but as a change to the
> voting procedure most likely does change or extend what's written down
> in GLEP 39 I'd like to see a election on those changes.

I replied to -council to keep this discussion off -dev.

--=20
Thanks,
Donnie

Donnie Berkholz
Developer, Gentoo Linux
Blog: http://dberkholz.wordpress.com

--g7w8+K/95kPelPD2
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAkl4rwcACgkQXVaO67S1rtsYfwCgz2iC7EFJ+xLMjeAMQm2hOtC5
1YsAn1xYvc1sFEgb5jD0XTJww9CPC4Gc
=XBIZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--g7w8+K/95kPelPD2--