From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LQ2G5-00059B-Ef for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 22 Jan 2009 16:18:24 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6BFA4E0323; Thu, 22 Jan 2009 16:16:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.175]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8E22E0323 for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2009 16:16:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 30so517272ugs.39 for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2009 08:16:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type; bh=/xM9D1js9/UJSC4qRDDQNTL99zAM/cysutyAeiV/ghI=; b=FS+HTfiui5P1xHcuegL8q0GGtUQAYXvn1b+4dorJ0/a1BCFRknwpnwCy1bvJqcIxF9 yZhLOVWFX1DS5yepuXiAgAs+QuE8e71ByU+jHgfetmttKCbkVzGyyjlT/QrTyoTp8QE3 YRfwkKmjo/xQeHY46fTT3xy5wpxMVmFjzTUUo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; b=x4ECYFO1Vp2Xcx5/lJP43volY+b3v/oDRHwwodzyUW53rwc+R5GdlDpapT1VRRUZ8m 8Gu/89yY/7U3Bwh29X0Aw/tRzSDBQb/xRpkfaD7lXkZMWIH4TrXVBhECTdXiYd9XPM5I MoXZ16+duA138ZQRl29wqnOwVqZ0bFc6ge6ho= Received: by 10.67.115.15 with SMTP id s15mr3278327ugm.56.1232640963751; Thu, 22 Jan 2009 08:16:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from snowcone (92-235-187-79.cable.ubr18.sgyl.blueyonder.co.uk [92.235.187.79]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o30sm19431773ugd.35.2009.01.22.08.16.02 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 22 Jan 2009 08:16:03 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 16:15:55 +0000 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] One-Day Gentoo Council Reminder for January 22 Message-ID: <20090122161555.6d4c449e@snowcone> In-Reply-To: <20090122000229.GF15870@comet> References: <20090121233526.GA15870@comet> <20090122000229.GF15870@comet> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.14.7; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/ocmiQIapB.yA2jg+sDlCbFz"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: f4bb1139-8dea-4f35-855b-dafc9c32be9b X-Archives-Hash: 704b60fb6ba54f6cdcfc04d63c560d31 --Sig_/ocmiQIapB.yA2jg+sDlCbFz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:02:29 -0800 Donnie Berkholz wrote: > - PMS, bug #250077: Do we need to get involved in this? (-dev) The question for this one, really, is whether people are happy having such a vaguely specified utility whose behaviour keeps changing in ways that break existing idioms. If they are, at the very least we'd need a guarantee from the Portage people that they're not going to change its behaviour yet again, and ideally they'd revert the recent behaviour changes back to what stable Portage does. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/ocmiQIapB.yA2jg+sDlCbFz Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkl4m74ACgkQ96zL6DUtXhEz4gCdF8wAWPV6WVSr64r3x7zp6rT6 XzEAoOVeCveYeMA4FxFAhSg1sbJ0P+7E =xh3H -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/ocmiQIapB.yA2jg+sDlCbFz--