[gentoo-dev] Re: Use full package atoms for bug reports

[Christian Faulhammer <fauli@gentoo.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 849 bytes --]

Hi,

Jeroen Roovers <jer@gentoo.org>:
> On Sun, 4 Jan 2009 14:52:11 +0100
> Christian Faulhammer <fauli@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > Please be so kind and use full package atoms in the bug description
> > line (especially when bug wrangling), searching is made easier that
> > way.
> 
>   "Bug reports that refer to a single or a few (similar) packages
>   should detail the package atom(s) as completely as possible in the
>   Summary, including a version only when other versions do not exhibit
>   the bug."[1]

 I know that piece, I wrote the initial version of that paragraph. :)
But some people who are allowed to assign directly (mostly developers)
tend to forget it.

V-Li

-- 
Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project
<URL:http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode

<URL:http://www.faulhammer.org/>

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]