From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LJWQW-00014W-Oe for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 04 Jan 2009 17:06:12 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6F66BE0690; Sun, 4 Jan 2009 17:06:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp-vbr19.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr19.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.39]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A826E0690 for ; Sun, 4 Jan 2009 17:06:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from epia.jer-c2.orkz.net (atwork-106.r-212.178.112.atwork.nl [212.178.112.106]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp-vbr19.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n04H69pH088362 for ; Sun, 4 Jan 2009 18:06:09 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jer@gentoo.org) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 18:06:08 +0100 From: Jeroen Roovers To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [v4] Planning for automatic assignment computation of bugs Message-ID: <20090104180608.2e0935e5@epia.jer-c2.orkz.net> In-Reply-To: <4960EB9D.6030808@gentoo.org> References: <20081019060114.GA21785@curie-int.orbis-terrarum.net> <200901041752.38316.rbu@gentoo.org> <4960EB9D.6030808@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.12.11; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner X-Archives-Salt: b3c3b433-ed15-4221-bf57-407e0b5fcd73 X-Archives-Hash: 16e9608d9858cd7aba0f587338f719df On Sun, 04 Jan 2009 17:02:21 +0000 Mike Auty wrote: > According to [1], "When the file lists multiple entries, then you > assign the bug to the first maintainer, and CC the other > maintainer(s) and herd(s)." So it looks as though the file should go > through the maintainers first and herds second? Should be pretty > easy to fix... I spotted that too but didn't remember putting it in black and white. :) The order ("first maintainer as assignee" or "first maintainer/herd as assignee") is open to discussion and I think this is the proper forum to have that discussion. Kind regards, jer