* [gentoo-dev] Use full package atoms for bug reports
@ 2009-01-04 13:52 Christian Faulhammer
2009-01-04 16:43 ` Jeroen Roovers
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Christian Faulhammer @ 2009-01-04 13:52 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 313 bytes --]
Hi,
Please be so kind and use full package atoms in the bug description
line (especially when bug wrangling), searching is made easier that way.
V-Li
--
Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project
<URL:http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode
<URL:http://www.faulhammer.org/>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] Use full package atoms for bug reports
2009-01-04 13:52 [gentoo-dev] Use full package atoms for bug reports Christian Faulhammer
@ 2009-01-04 16:43 ` Jeroen Roovers
2009-01-04 23:45 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2009-01-05 23:49 ` Christian Faulhammer
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jeroen Roovers @ 2009-01-04 16:43 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
On Sun, 4 Jan 2009 14:52:11 +0100
Christian Faulhammer <fauli@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please be so kind and use full package atoms in the bug description
> line (especially when bug wrangling), searching is made easier that
> way.
"Bug reports that refer to a single or a few (similar) packages
should detail the package atom(s) as completely as possible in the
Summary, including a version only when other versions do not exhibit
the bug."[1]
Kind regards,
jer
[1] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/qa/bug-wranglers/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [gentoo-dev] Re: Use full package atoms for bug reports
2009-01-04 16:43 ` Jeroen Roovers
@ 2009-01-04 23:45 ` Duncan
2009-01-04 23:52 ` Mike Auty
2009-01-05 23:49 ` Christian Faulhammer
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Duncan @ 2009-01-04 23:45 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
Jeroen Roovers <jer@gentoo.org> posted
20090104174353.22981e4e@epia.jer-c2.orkz.net, excerpted below, on Sun, 04
Jan 2009 17:43:53 +0100:
> On Sun, 4 Jan 2009 14:52:11 +0100
> Christian Faulhammer <fauli@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
>> Please be so kind and use full package atoms in the bug description
>> line (especially when bug wrangling), searching is made easier that
>> way.
>
> "Bug reports that refer to a single or a few (similar) packages should
> detail the package atom(s) as completely as possible in the Summary,
> including a version only when other versions do not exhibit the
> bug."[1]
> [1] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/qa/bug-wranglers/
I think the problem is more as in this bug. Note the "Amarok2", the
reason I ended up filing a dup, because I searched for "amarok-2" and
didn't catch this bug. Someone with the authority to do so might wish to
change the summary accordingly... altho it does seem most CCs were able
to find the bug without the dup I ended up with, and the bug is still
getting frequent CC additions.
Amarok2 - dev-db/mysql-community - ld: /usr/lib64/mysql/libmysqld.a
(client.o): relocation R_X86_64_32S against `client_errors' can not be
used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=238487
--
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Use full package atoms for bug reports
2009-01-04 23:45 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
@ 2009-01-04 23:52 ` Mike Auty
2009-01-05 6:58 ` Duncan
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Mike Auty @ 2009-01-04 23:52 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Duncan wrote:
> Amarok2 - dev-db/mysql-community - ld: /usr/lib64/mysql/libmysqld.a
> (client.o): relocation R_X86_64_32S against `client_errors' can not be
> used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
Well, I fixed this individual instance. As Jer pointed out, it's in the
bug-wrangling guide. Unfortunately the bug wranglers are only human,
and sometimes some will slip through. If you find any more, it might be
worth contacting a bug wrangler directly...
Mike 5:)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAklhS6wACgkQu7rWomwgFXo5cwCePAVcKM2cJwY8SeXiDEHldzfl
NycAn3JA5dtadT7Ip/4RDyoXODd8NEtY
=PST+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [gentoo-dev] Re: Use full package atoms for bug reports
2009-01-04 23:52 ` Mike Auty
@ 2009-01-05 6:58 ` Duncan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Duncan @ 2009-01-05 6:58 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
Mike Auty <ikelos@gentoo.org> posted 49614BAD.6040403@gentoo.org,
excerpted below, on Sun, 04 Jan 2009 23:52:13 +0000:
> Duncan wrote:
>> Amarok2 - dev-db/mysql-community - ld: /usr/lib64/mysql/libmysqld.a
>> (client.o): relocation R_X86_64_32S against `client_errors' can not be
>> used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
>
> Well, I fixed this individual instance. As Jer pointed out, it's in the
> bug-wrangling guide. Unfortunately the bug wranglers are only human,
> and sometimes some will slip through. If you find any more, it might be
> worth contacting a bug wrangler directly...
Thanks.
FWIW, after I posted I got thinking. I believe that may have happened
because the bug was originally filed on amarok2 _pre builds, which had
amarok-1.9x or some such versions, IIRC, but could have still been
referred to as amarok2, thus the original name. But in any case it could/
should have been updated after amarok-2 was released... and now it has
been. =:^)
--
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [gentoo-dev] Re: Use full package atoms for bug reports
2009-01-04 16:43 ` Jeroen Roovers
2009-01-04 23:45 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
@ 2009-01-05 23:49 ` Christian Faulhammer
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Christian Faulhammer @ 2009-01-05 23:49 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 849 bytes --]
Hi,
Jeroen Roovers <jer@gentoo.org>:
> On Sun, 4 Jan 2009 14:52:11 +0100
> Christian Faulhammer <fauli@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > Please be so kind and use full package atoms in the bug description
> > line (especially when bug wrangling), searching is made easier that
> > way.
>
> "Bug reports that refer to a single or a few (similar) packages
> should detail the package atom(s) as completely as possible in the
> Summary, including a version only when other versions do not exhibit
> the bug."[1]
I know that piece, I wrote the initial version of that paragraph. :)
But some people who are allowed to assign directly (mostly developers)
tend to forget it.
V-Li
--
Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project
<URL:http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode
<URL:http://www.faulhammer.org/>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-01-05 23:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-01-04 13:52 [gentoo-dev] Use full package atoms for bug reports Christian Faulhammer
2009-01-04 16:43 ` Jeroen Roovers
2009-01-04 23:45 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2009-01-04 23:52 ` Mike Auty
2009-01-05 6:58 ` Duncan
2009-01-05 23:49 ` Christian Faulhammer
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox