From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LJWJa-0007as-Bx for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 04 Jan 2009 16:59:02 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 472CCE0458; Sun, 4 Jan 2009 16:59:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ew0-f21.google.com (mail-ew0-f21.google.com [209.85.219.21]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01AB4E0458 for ; Sun, 4 Jan 2009 16:58:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy14 with SMTP id 14so8012874ewy.10 for ; Sun, 04 Jan 2009 08:58:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; bh=WA9BDTgiAcDgu++oJY1WJR3JaBB2vDcSJ1LunMMcGFY=; b=dAqlLPYIvD1zk4gcDiZ+7aMvqUCu/QvDOFKd29kIskTCzBSj8acUMQ6DSg6vUlKH+d DM1UQ4I1023y1qMDIASmgSiBV9vVhhAjPlYuFHc6IkiMemfK7HZYsvx17XqNDv2obssc BQBLvjX/sYLyjjFg02H2rq56z/66TFGYCxAlk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :message-id; b=aLYGWCyeRzJIlL7IxYuJQX06zkrGyU23Z8wsMEDREoXvlV2xc1Dy5svLtNXZaPqzn9 UmvOFswJDwlE0uarFFbEv+HUIUo+PkYsc3igMClP5B0IVMroVShwRRWElmb945djhn7l d0sWOFV+zNLd9AYfGP4GBM4WIKbwuHvCyDpbk= Received: by 10.210.29.11 with SMTP id c11mr6359285ebc.31.1231088339460; Sun, 04 Jan 2009 08:58:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.0.2? (5ad1a909.bb.sky.com [90.209.169.9]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q9sm10867265gve.18.2009.01.04.08.58.58 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 04 Jan 2009 08:58:58 -0800 (PST) From: David Leverton To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] USE dependencies Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 16:58:56 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 References: <20090104145426.30527441@terra.solaris> <20090104160845.40a17677@snowcone> <8b4c83ad0901040848m3f3a701fs63f6e1386911dd1b@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <8b4c83ad0901040848m3f3a701fs63f6e1386911dd1b@mail.gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200901041658.56725.levertond@googlemail.com> X-Archives-Salt: 18ee22d4-7bef-4dd9-ae13-e030c3e3f6e8 X-Archives-Hash: 15e9217f14da8622de695a9d8192b1d4 On Sunday 04 January 2009 16:48:38 Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: > On the contrary, the reverse of what you say is true. A simple grep of > the tree showed that: In how many of those ebuilds would the long form be use1? ( cat/pkg[use2] ) rather than use1? ( cat/pkg[use2] ) !use1? ( cat/pkg ) ? Obviously I didn't look through all the hits, but the former seems quite common, and any possible shortcut would only save a few characters.