From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LAeEq-0002BG-LS for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 05:37:29 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 67BD4E0469; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 05:37:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp6.oregonstate.edu (smtp6.oregonstate.edu [128.193.15.46]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D76EE0469 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 05:37:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp6.oregonstate.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA58BC8869D for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2008 21:37:26 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at oregonstate.edu Received: from smtp6.oregonstate.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.oregonstate.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oSRKcQVo81ul for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2008 21:37:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from xray.science.oregonstate.edu (xray.science.oregonstate.edu [128.193.220.51]) by smtp6.oregonstate.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89F5FC88617 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2008 21:37:26 -0800 (PST) Received: by xray.science.oregonstate.edu (Postfix, from userid 1194) id 8658010D14FA; Wed, 10 Dec 2008 21:37:26 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 21:37:26 -0800 From: Donnie Berkholz To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal for how to handle stable ebuilds Message-ID: <20081211053726.GE31807@hermes> References: <20081110181334.GD7038@aerie.halcy0n.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="BZaMRJmqxGScZ8Mx" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20081110181334.GD7038@aerie.halcy0n.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Archives-Salt: a0d25bf2-7995-49d5-a781-85ccf2bf29cf X-Archives-Hash: 82468105efc21b0365f64340f64a1293 --BZaMRJmqxGScZ8Mx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 13:13 Mon 10 Nov , Mark Loeser wrote: > Instead of addressing archs as being slackers or not, this addresses it > as a more granular layer of looking at ebuilds. Thanks to Richard > Freeman for the initial proposal that I based this off of. Please give me > feedback on this proposal, if you think it sucks (preferably with an > explanation why), or if you think it might work. I'm not convinced why this needs to happen, because there's no reasoning=20 behind it here. There needs to be rationale for why this should happen=20 with pros and cons. dang mentioned a few pros from the maintainer side,=20 the arch team ones are pretty easy to come up with. --=20 Thanks, Donnie Donnie Berkholz Developer, Gentoo Linux Blog: http://dberkholz.wordpress.com --BZaMRJmqxGScZ8Mx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAklApxYACgkQXVaO67S1rtvfGACeO4YzmNE72w2IFHBiCewCh54N iksAmgOklnlK2u7IxrcIHml308jupvOi =VNyF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --BZaMRJmqxGScZ8Mx--