From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LAeDE-0001qd-0A for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 05:35:48 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6D51FE0465; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 05:35:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp7.oregonstate.edu (smtp7.oregonstate.edu [128.193.15.47]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48C80E0465 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 05:35:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp7.oregonstate.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 975EC440D38 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2008 21:35:45 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at oregonstate.edu Received: from smtp7.oregonstate.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.oregonstate.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GBuoGsTB8A+F for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2008 21:35:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from xray.science.oregonstate.edu (xray.science.oregonstate.edu [128.193.220.51]) by smtp7.oregonstate.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E047440D7F for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2008 21:35:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by xray.science.oregonstate.edu (Postfix, from userid 1194) id 6909210D14FA; Wed, 10 Dec 2008 21:35:45 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 21:35:45 -0800 From: Donnie Berkholz To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal for how to handle stable ebuilds Message-ID: <20081211053545.GD31807@hermes> References: <20081110181334.GD7038@aerie.halcy0n.com> <1226597916.3918.22.camel@homer.ob.libexec.de> <20081115130210.GA4219@pluto> <1226945319.3939.30.camel@homer.ob.libexec.de> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="SO98HVl1bnMOfKZd" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1226945319.3939.30.camel@homer.ob.libexec.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Archives-Salt: b339cd3b-09f0-4909-b4bf-32cebf4a22f3 X-Archives-Hash: 8cf2449d3f6ee8e44ddbbc61a5a1d493 --SO98HVl1bnMOfKZd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 19:08 Mon 17 Nov , Tobias Scherbaum wrote: > That would people require to use common sense. The past has shown that > people tend to have different views of what common sense might be in a > given case. Therefore policy in that aspect needs to be as clear and > understandable as possible to avoid unnecessary discussions. I'd rather say people need to figure out common sense so we don't need=20 to document hundreds of pages of every tiny detail. It seems like the=20 vast majority of people don't have a problem with figuring this stuff=20 out. --=20 Thanks, Donnie Donnie Berkholz Developer, Gentoo Linux Blog: http://dberkholz.wordpress.com --SO98HVl1bnMOfKZd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAklAprEACgkQXVaO67S1rts8YACeLesZZ2rKmvUTpyXyC2VPCpms fV8AoItfgqCsIFrCodBM1lNU1KtFNYez =hRbV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --SO98HVl1bnMOfKZd--