From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1L9qCQ-0005j1-01 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 09 Dec 2008 00:11:38 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 932A5E0420; Tue, 9 Dec 2008 00:11:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.172]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54073E0420 for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2008 00:11:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 30so775876ugs.39 for ; Mon, 08 Dec 2008 16:11:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type; bh=lmRbfDsLB8D5mGi41W8LzzSgIebSMJ1zk+KxRhhUN20=; b=Tol/r1TNybdJ01w+m9sVEFXp4NaawrtQQV1xo9xED5vt93o6hLR/K+XYLtwJnVmopF Ty7vopdWOufgY9rSMbL+c2E2SaymfvbBrNR8YoisXh/dUCTpTfoJ00/cl0gpCW9DnIIC KCTJSN7bzz3ocjLmJC7rDoPZDfcXi/Fr+7zpo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; b=BDvZ1tKZGngmxB953gGy7w8+UnfklEh6ru4bSscn4SmQYEL9my2SgURTnGGKEdaxId h2w5SwlOKyBs7SEDNHvWU3r9qFfegO0wW10x9BnKSvrUtx8DivOeVJe3FNPeZYyvkSZJ RxPJCoEfNaBtpAaj1bxQnrkPgl8vp+rmTQ+zA= Received: by 10.66.243.2 with SMTP id q2mr2791486ugh.1.1228781494409; Mon, 08 Dec 2008 16:11:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from snowmobile (92-235-187-79.cable.ubr18.sgyl.blueyonder.co.uk [92.235.187.79]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a1sm8995878ugf.26.2008.12.08.16.11.33 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 08 Dec 2008 16:11:33 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 00:11:23 +0000 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI 2 policy for portage tree Message-ID: <20081209001123.16281209@snowmobile> In-Reply-To: <1228781390.7351.2.camel@TesterTop3.tester.ca> References: <493DB50A.8090403@jmhengen.net> <1228781390.7351.2.camel@TesterTop3.tester.ca> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.6.1 (GTK+ 2.14.4; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/b.UN=hNERuycqLrvkZTcP/+"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: 2e043fd0-49a2-4114-83f5-e11a820eb4c8 X-Archives-Hash: 4d5a3221d50aba8bcf6385a680dd93be --Sig_/b.UN=hNERuycqLrvkZTcP/+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 19:09:50 -0500 Olivier Cr=C3=AAte wrote: > I'd like to go further and ask that for the next EAPI change, we only > allow ebuilds using it into the tree once a version of portage that > supports it has gone stable. And then, not make any ebuild with the > new EAPI stable for 60 more days so that the new EAPI related code in > portage can be tested properly. The "can be tested properly" phase is when it's in ~arch... --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/b.UN=hNERuycqLrvkZTcP/+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkk9t7AACgkQ96zL6DUtXhElNwCgrRIPfvPYtdI92fGdNMzTMIB5 TSgAoJeIUszTnP6o0gDb/n5McvgzZKuo =al6V -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/b.UN=hNERuycqLrvkZTcP/+--