From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1L6bCU-0007AE-N2 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 30 Nov 2008 01:34:18 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 14AC0E01B9; Sun, 30 Nov 2008 01:34:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp7.oregonstate.edu (smtp7.oregonstate.edu [128.193.15.47]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3EB3E01B9; Sun, 30 Nov 2008 01:34:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp7.oregonstate.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id D806E440D0C; Sat, 29 Nov 2008 17:34:07 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at oregonstate.edu Received: from smtp7.oregonstate.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.oregonstate.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FAIaKqZH5Q7T; Sat, 29 Nov 2008 17:34:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from xray.science.oregonstate.edu (xray.science.oregonstate.edu [128.193.220.51]) by smtp7.oregonstate.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE66C440CAE; Sat, 29 Nov 2008 17:34:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by xray.science.oregonstate.edu (Postfix, from userid 1194) id BCB7D10D1259; Sun, 30 Nov 2008 18:34:07 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 18:34:07 -0800 From: Donnie Berkholz To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: "Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto" , gentoo-council , gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-project] Gentoo Council nominations are now closed Message-ID: <20081201023407.GA376@hermes> References: <4930A68C.6050800@gentoo.org> <22b538bc0811290402i3a917803o20394d04101f36ce@mail.gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="lrZ03NoBR/3+SXJZ" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <22b538bc0811290402i3a917803o20394d04101f36ce@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Archives-Salt: 96338147-24f9-4fa9-9ff1-1f8cf3ca42d1 X-Archives-Hash: c88a365e259f2667cb0122ed1cb02750 --lrZ03NoBR/3+SXJZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 10:02 Sat 29 Nov , Mauricio Lima Pilla wrote: > What are the nominees intending to do if they are elected? I miss the > manifests. To those of you telling us to look at what you do now, what you're=20 saying is that you're good in your current role. That doesn't support=20 why you would be good in a different role as a council member. In other words, writing good code doesn't make you good at everything in=20 Gentoo. It doesn't mean you would make a good docs writer, a good devrel=20 member, a good trustee, or a good council member. They all involve=20 different activities or different levels of thought. All I'd like to hear is the same thing I'd want from a job candidate --=20 what makes you uniquely qualified? We have plenty of technically good=20 developers running, so that doesn't exactly differentiate you. What is your vision for what the council should do? How about what=20 Gentoo should do? How would you make it happen? --=20 Thanks, Donnie Donnie Berkholz Developer, Gentoo Linux Blog: http://dberkholz.wordpress.com --lrZ03NoBR/3+SXJZ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkkzTR8ACgkQXVaO67S1rtsoAACgwGz/R7ZiIwDW+rlVQHQI0Lwr nnEAniapDIAu44yBMC6JsJFLSH7Zrlv5 =Eod8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --lrZ03NoBR/3+SXJZ--