From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1L6mdU-00032B-5g for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 30 Nov 2008 13:46:56 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8792BE02BA; Sun, 30 Nov 2008 13:46:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 625F7E02BA for ; Sun, 30 Nov 2008 13:46:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from arcarius.localnet (unknown [88.103.16.210]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A872964332 for ; Sun, 30 Nov 2008 13:46:53 +0000 (UTC) From: =?utf-8?q?Tom=C3=A1=C5=A1_Chv=C3=A1tal?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Moving HOMEPAGE out of ebuilds for the future Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 14:46:39 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.10.3 (Linux/2.6.27-gentoo; KDE/4.1.3; x86_64; ; ) References: In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1868384.AFhCMrI9zV"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200811301446.43234.scarabeus@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 5485d6a1-9402-4e4c-8a31-8578626c89a7 X-Archives-Hash: 87081ff5876a5275511da5f66cf8e599 --nextPart1868384.AFhCMrI9zV Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Sunday 30 November 2008 14:23:48 Diego 'Flameeyes' Petten=C3=B2 wrote: > I have a very quick proposal: why don't we move the packages' homepage > in metadata.xml (since it's usually unique for all the versions) and we > get rid of the variable for the next EAPI version? I would rather see something like: packagename/metadata.xml packagename/package-base.ebuild packagename/packagename-version.ebuild packagename/Manifest packagename/Changelog Where package-base would store everything basic for the ebuild, licences an= d=20 so on, and in package-version would be only specific changes for the versio= n=20 (for example patching Makefile). Variables will be overridable this way and thus i think it would be nicer. --nextPart1868384.AFhCMrI9zV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkkymUMACgkQHB6c3gNBRYcOMgCdF+f/iCEx+wK93kLJII7chFsa THkAoMutP/JH/bxq5yk6M/X9QT6FJlsE =0hfX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1868384.AFhCMrI9zV--