On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:57:23 -0500 Daniel Gryniewicz wrote: > This is not about arches just being slackers. This is about arches > denying stable (or even ~) for some reason. If I cannot drop an old > version of something just because the new version doesn't (and won't) > work on an arch, that's really bad for me. What is the cost of keeping it there and not changing it? -- Ciaran McCreesh