From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1L12U8-0005y8-Mi for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 14 Nov 2008 17:29:32 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 05908E0312; Fri, 14 Nov 2008 17:29:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.171]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF56AE0312 for ; Fri, 14 Nov 2008 17:29:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sheridan (dslb-088-070-212-027.pools.arcor-ip.net [88.70.212.27]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu7) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0ML2xA-1L12U51GV3-0003q2; Fri, 14 Nov 2008 18:29:29 +0100 Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 18:28:59 +0100 From: Marius Mauch To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Please review: function epunt_la_files for eutils.eclass Message-Id: <20081114182859.68a37d30.genone@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <1226658944.8899.3.camel@woix.comwax.com> References: <200811091704.10291.loki_val@gentoo.org> <200811121540.50740.loki_val@gentoo.org> <491B00DB.4000901@gentoo.org> <200811121816.04870.loki_val@gentoo.org> <1226658944.8899.3.camel@woix.comwax.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.8 (GTK+ 2.10.14; i686-pc-mingw32) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX195Otvi8QQpqqfhU2JX+aq3MVGMtBjllCJQ1Hb IM2QyGvgM92znTf3SG5sKzNQHrdxGOQAClig1XpBYP9UQY8olj wK74eIr4EdSMv+Z8v0krQ== X-Archives-Salt: 94bd8b00-a416-4ea4-8932-153f14bb6267 X-Archives-Hash: 2e706d076cdd1aa2484098069b52ebdb On Fri, 14 Nov 2008 11:35:44 +0100 Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: > Le mercredi 12 novembre 2008 =E0 18:16 +0100, Peter Alfredsen a =E9crit : > [snip] > > > Mart had already proposed a "static-lib" USE flag. Donnie just > > > suggested on IRC we turn this use flag into a FEATURES flag. > >=20 > > That's problematic. You can't turn off a FEATURES flag for > > individual packages. See above. >=20 > yes you can, can't find the related doc (it's not in portage man), but > that's what /etc/portage/env/ can do for you. Only for some FEATURES though (depending on where they are implemented).