From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1L0FAY-0003po-7z for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 12:50:02 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E13C1E03D7; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 12:50:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from derhammer.net (mephisto.derhammer.net [213.239.201.13]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F7A5E03D7 for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 12:50:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 4926 invoked by uid 1000); 12 Nov 2008 12:49:58 -0000 Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 13:49:58 +0100 From: Michael Hammer To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] An official Gentoo wiki Message-ID: <20081112124958.GP4535@mephisto> References: <20081111234532.GG7038@aerie.halcy0n.com> <20081112094442.GL4535@mephisto> <491AC569.50407@gentoo.org> <491AC68C.6040701@ceng.metu.edu.tr> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cmVHo2jXx4bdYlgS" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <491AC68C.6040701@ceng.metu.edu.tr> X-GPG-Fingerprint: 8704 11D1 048A 2F24 89D0 6B9E 3EC4 6EDF 1BA5 F0DE X-GPG-Key-ID: 0x1BA5F0DE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) X-Archives-Salt: f857d4a0-ae8c-49b8-a47e-798e599779b6 X-Archives-Hash: a6d4126b5c832d04a84bd1ef698fa20e --cmVHo2jXx4bdYlgS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable * Gokdeniz Karadag [081112 13:06]: > Petteri R=E4ty demis ki:: > > Michael Hammer wrote: > > We should develop some kind of review process and at least the > > possiblity to lock and hide pages of poor quality. In the most cases > > the howtos are related to some herds. What if we have a "reviewed > > section" where herds can approve pages and user can be sure that the > > infos provided have a minimum of quality. > >=20 > > We already have a reviewed section. It's called GDP. You're fully right! The GDP can therefore be the reviewed sections where documents from the wiki are transfered to. > The wiki can be a staging ground for user contributed documents, which can > become part of official docs after a review and cleanup by developers. That's the way I intended my proposal. As some kind of early state GDP documents. It's an unwritten fact that user are willing to contribute to wiki systems - but I've never received an xml file for our GDP written by a user ;) ... The wiki can be the place to develop new howtos by disburding the devs - IMHO. g, mueli --=20 ------------------------------------------------------------ Michael Hammer | | Graz, AT Gentoo Developer (Kerberos) | http://www.michael-hammer.at --cmVHo2jXx4bdYlgS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkka0PYACgkQPsRu3xul8N7P8QCcDaoXHFtQeyzzAtvShKTEoHY7 cxsAn2ql0Db3ybKZvoQf8prAi2G2wuEI =zga5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --cmVHo2jXx4bdYlgS--