From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KxRVh-0000YY-68 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 04 Nov 2008 19:24:20 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2A3EDE048C; Tue, 4 Nov 2008 19:24:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00B60E048C for ; Tue, 4 Nov 2008 19:24:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (i577A0DB5.versanet.de [87.122.13.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F9CC641B0 for ; Tue, 4 Nov 2008 19:24:13 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 20:23:53 +0100 From: Christoph Mende To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Reinstating eclasses Message-ID: <20081104202353.43c68d49@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <20081104131525.6821d0ed@halo.dirtyepic.sk.ca> References: <20081104174307.5bd3d834@gentoo.org> <491097EB.4070608@gentoo.org> <20081104131525.6821d0ed@halo.dirtyepic.sk.ca> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.6.1 (GTK+ 2.14.4; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/3duz2hrzU05ZzPBSDjWSBy7"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: ed5f3f03-19b1-43bd-8d00-874ae90bb640 X-Archives-Hash: f5e3909cb51409544089d27f93b8802f --Sig_/3duz2hrzU05ZzPBSDjWSBy7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 4 Nov 2008 13:15:25 -0600 Ryan Hill wrote: > On Tue, 04 Nov 2008 13:43:55 -0500 > Joe Peterson wrote: >=20 > > Christoph Mende wrote: > > > Now the most logical name for an eclass like that > > > would be xfce4.eclass, except that eclass already exists. > >=20 > > Since the new eclass is not version specific, how about simply > > "xfce.eclass"? Well, the desktop is usually called Xfce4, plus that'd match gnome2... and more or less kde4 > why bother introducing yet another xfce*.eclass when you can re-use an > existing one? >=20 That's what I want to do :P We currently have xfce4.eclass, xfce42.eclass and xfce44.eclass. 42 and 44 are obviously versioned, 4 isn't, but isn't nearly compatible with my new one, partly because it was used (and probably exclusively written) for 4.2. --=20 Christoph Mende Gentoo/AMD64 Operational Lead and Release Engineering GPG: EE2A 454A 6A3B A2D8 E43B FF45 2A19 C3B3 6DA0 C1AF --Sig_/3duz2hrzU05ZzPBSDjWSBy7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkkQoVcACgkQKhnDs22gwa/6iQCglhQSZUORwQhkh0k00r5l9NdI 9kQAoOEf08ST5gMYuxgetSiCNSfOIeN6 =pnkI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/3duz2hrzU05ZzPBSDjWSBy7--