public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-dev]  Re: GCC 4.3 pre-stabilization
Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 11:22:54 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081101112254.26b5d922@halo.dirtyepic.sk.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20081101143009.7f506d2e@terra.solaris

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1264 bytes --]

On Sat, 1 Nov 2008 14:30:09 +0100
Christian Faulhammer <opfer@gentoo.org> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@gentoo.org>:
> 
> > In anticipation of getting GCC 4.3 stabilized sometime, I'd like to
> > ask maintainers check if their current stable packages build with
> > 4.3, and if not please stabilize a version that does in the near
> > future if at all possible.  Stabilizing this version is going to be
> > a huge job due to the number of packages that don't compile due to
> > implicit C++ standard library header dependencies that got cleaned
> > up in 4.3.[i], so anything you could do ahead of time to save our
> > sanity would be greatly appreciated.
> 
>  Is there a bug that is blocked by such stabilisation requests?  We
> had such a thing on the GCC 4 transition (apart from the normal
> porting tracker) and was really handy.  I will rebuild three x86
> systems (one totally stable, two mostly) to check.

There is now:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=245160

Thanks for the help. :)

-- 
gcc-porting,                                      by design, by neglect
treecleaner,                              for a fact or just for effect
wxwidgets @ gentoo     EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2008-11-01 17:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-10-31 18:28 [gentoo-dev] GCC 4.3 pre-stabilization Ryan Hill
2008-11-01 13:30 ` [gentoo-dev] " Christian Faulhammer
2008-11-01 17:22   ` Ryan Hill [this message]
2008-11-01 17:30 ` [gentoo-dev] " Jose Luis Rivero
2008-11-01 22:29   ` [gentoo-dev] " Ryan Hill

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20081101112254.26b5d922@halo.dirtyepic.sk.ca \
    --to=dirtyepic@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox