From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KvzFo-0005KT-KP for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 31 Oct 2008 19:01:54 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 426F8E0511; Fri, 31 Oct 2008 19:01:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CF24E0511 for ; Fri, 31 Oct 2008 19:01:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sapphire (atlnts.org [85.222.29.130]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F18E64AD2 for ; Fri, 31 Oct 2008 19:01:50 +0000 (UTC) From: Dawid =?utf-8?q?W=C4=99gli=C5=84ski?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] kerberos USE flag Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 20:01:45 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 References: <490B1BCB.1020008@gentoo.org> <200810311920.57411.cla@gentoo.org> <490B5156.7080403@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <490B5156.7080403@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo Linux Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200810312001.45963.cla@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: fed85a5e-1078-48d8-93d5-aeee9fd8af33 X-Archives-Hash: b7353d6874ada664b8a392102782128c On Friday 31 of October 2008 19:41:26 Doug Goldstein wrote: > Dawid W=C4=99gli=C5=84ski wrote: > > On Friday 31 of October 2008 19:17:45 Doug Goldstein wrote: > >> Marius Mauch wrote: > >>> On Fri, 31 Oct 2008 10:52:59 -0400 > >>> > >>> Doug Goldstein wrote: > >>>> Someone remind me again why we have the kerberos USE flag enabled by > >>>> default? > >>> > >>> AFAIK it was added so that the default profile provides support for > >>> joining a Windows domain (same for the ldap flag). > >> > >> So let's use EAPI=3D1 in just the samba ebuild and do +kerberos in the= re. > > > > samba needs USE=3D"ads ldap" to join NT domain. > > heh. You beat me to the punch. I was just about to say that samba > doesn't have a kerberos USE flag. > > So any objections to me nuking this USE flag pronto? I'd be +1 to drop kerberos useflag, and probably make use of eapi1 in=20 nfs-utils and such, where kerberos would be more apropriate.