From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KrQra-00020w-46 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 19 Oct 2008 05:30:02 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 854DDE02B9; Sun, 19 Oct 2008 05:30:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B7F6E02B9 for ; Sun, 19 Oct 2008 05:30:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADAA364811 for ; Sun, 19 Oct 2008 05:29:58 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -3.207 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.207 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.392, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6eLFmPXzXpxb for ; Sun, 19 Oct 2008 05:29:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBD4B6470C for ; Sun, 19 Oct 2008 05:29:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1KrQrK-0001mv-HX for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Sun, 19 Oct 2008 05:29:46 +0000 Received: from s010600a0d12f7cee.mj.shawcable.net ([70.64.204.64]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 19 Oct 2008 05:29:46 +0000 Received: from dirtyepic by s010600a0d12f7cee.mj.shawcable.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 19 Oct 2008 05:29:46 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Ryan Hill Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] some global useflags Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 23:29:28 -0600 Message-ID: <20081018232928.11802a69@halo.dirtyepic.sk.ca> References: <20081015183632.499d5e6c@gentoo.org> <20081015174338.5ee92974@googlemail.com> <20081015211631.190f140a@googlemail.com> <20081016222655.5506cf23@googlemail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/d1Lu_JB2EQhkGzpAf_0RIVM"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: s010600a0d12f7cee.mj.shawcable.net X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 3.6.1 (GTK+ 2.14.3; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: 20443980-6121-40a3-a5f5-8bca2b5b6ba8 X-Archives-Hash: 34c1b7009c7d55b1097b1aefd4a4a8e5 --Sig_/d1Lu_JB2EQhkGzpAf_0RIVM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 18 Oct 2008 13:22:09 +0100 Steve Long wrote: > Ciaran McCreesh wrote: >=20 > > On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 22:06:40 +0100 > > Steve Long wrote: > >> > Have a look at, for example, [1], where Mike already gave you an > >> > answer one of the previous times we discussed it. > >> > > >> I'm aware of the prior discussion. > >> Re-read it, and tell me what it breaks, if you can. > >=20 > > Well, which part of the previous times it's been explained to you > > didn't you understand? > >=20 > No one has ever given me a technical reason. I thought you might have > light to shed; clearly not. >=20 > Please don't reply to my posts if you don't have any actual > information to add; I realise you like long fruitless mail > 'discussions', and apparently have lots of time for them, but I > don't, and I don't enjoy reading them either. This kind of one-liner > with zero content, and no intent but to insult, should simply be > binned without sending imo. Okay, Steve, stop. I don't think you realize it, but you are trolling this list. Every second post is you and Ciaran bitching at each other or you complaining about every single thing we do that you don't personally like. We appreciate your input, but please respect our right to do things the way we think is best for us, even if they aren't aligned to your personal preferences. --=20 gcc-porting, by design, by neglect treecleaner, for a fact or just for effect wxwidgets @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662 --Sig_/d1Lu_JB2EQhkGzpAf_0RIVM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkj6xbgACgkQiqiDRvmkBmLDCgCgnZr1oLd23w5GKZcfNt+BMyqp x3kAnjQZGZLM/MAylOxMF0ZAj7S4T9MT =WH+R -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/d1Lu_JB2EQhkGzpAf_0RIVM--