From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KpSAU-0000bh-SJ for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 13 Oct 2008 18:29:23 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 86CCFE0326; Mon, 13 Oct 2008 18:29:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.185]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34EC0E0326 for ; Mon, 13 Oct 2008 18:29:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id c7so845431nfi.26 for ; Mon, 13 Oct 2008 11:29:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type; bh=v31JpW9erqgHoaR94Hci5Lu3n1bY5hdmVoskLaMOn7M=; b=nVtNnS85AnkUS0CBh6CKIe7jps7TnWpxzsNtNUOf/IV3DOlaKma8eGcz4OD/4c3Ekc 0DwIkkNugknCwXrB/Q7XcWcFzgg3qT/+7TbB90SEOTW25VN0swrpyqNQn4xn4isguo1h RuVOybqprbFyeLKIG7nw+5vuqZtwtBHYdoOaI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; b=O8dPGKuFUR9B01ZIaJQno0XcFY0F8FStIU9SEZfU36A7ooVlQVRAsxe/SSg7jp+HcJ F6mLpJZPNXV9h8BGaEN1A149hjzcB0TZoxkzPEHY8fDl6r+nO9y0FAiDp/e3GLM4A3O8 eBHPwAJwKM1XZwt2nR7EQ4WhYaEfYmqoQjK1I= Received: by 10.210.141.4 with SMTP id o4mr5889489ebd.57.1223922549576; Mon, 13 Oct 2008 11:29:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from snowmobile (92-235-187-79.cable.ubr18.edin.blueyonder.co.uk [92.235.187.79]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i6sm10938624gve.2.2008.10.13.11.29.07 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 13 Oct 2008 11:29:08 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 19:28:53 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI change: Call ebuild functions from trusted working directory Message-ID: <20081013192853.4454d779@snowmobile> In-Reply-To: <20081013174221.GB23706@comet> References: <200810092103.33472.rbu@gentoo.org> <20081013174221.GB23706@comet> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.14.3; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/m9rQ7_fJ+XbLSqBTWOnG/qf"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: 2a9f8499-7082-4050-afeb-7d7d2876a44e X-Archives-Hash: d04b46fe4230fa4e5c8baebac29b227e --Sig_/m9rQ7_fJ+XbLSqBTWOnG/qf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 13 Oct 2008 10:42:21 -0700 Donnie Berkholz wrote: > It seems to me that this is an EAPI=3D0 change. Since EAPI=3D1 and EAPI= =3D2=20 > are just differences to EAPI=3D0, they wouldn't be voted on. Since > EAPI=3D0 isn't actually approved yet, council wouldn't vote either. As > it's a draft standard, this would be resolved amongst package-manager=20 > developers and PMS editors. It's a retroactive change to EAPI 0 that requires changes from package managers and has security implications... Robert isn't requesting that we specify and mandate existing behaviour here, so it's not really something that should be left up to PMS to decide and enforce. I mean, if the Council's comfortable with PMS being used to force package manager changes for things that aren't obviously bugs, we could do it without asking, but that looks a lot like a slippery slope... --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/m9rQ7_fJ+XbLSqBTWOnG/qf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkjzk2wACgkQ96zL6DUtXhFsMgCgibIJc74aq4XFdDGNMZdOahpB Zz4AoMj5JHAadZSngMGsuXxq0uiSwv+O =eiWh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/m9rQ7_fJ+XbLSqBTWOnG/qf--