From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KpRR2-0005er-UT for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 13 Oct 2008 17:42:25 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0DA3AE0262; Mon, 13 Oct 2008 17:42:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA679E0262 for ; Mon, 13 Oct 2008 17:42:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gentoo.org (xray.science.oregonstate.edu [128.193.220.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B281641AA for ; Mon, 13 Oct 2008 17:42:21 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 10:42:21 -0700 From: Donnie Berkholz To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI change: Call ebuild functions from trusted working directory Message-ID: <20081013174221.GB23706@comet> References: <200810092103.33472.rbu@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Bn2rw/3z4jIqBvZU" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200810092103.33472.rbu@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Archives-Salt: e9b8c844-44ed-424a-8671-15ca9c4a8b40 X-Archives-Hash: bc7d5ee29487ec2ece696ec14b503e19 --Bn2rw/3z4jIqBvZU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 21:03 Thu 09 Oct , Robert Buchholz wrote: > I would like: > * everyone to comment on the change and propose changes to the wording > * council to vote on this change to EAPI-0, -1 and -2. It seems to me that this is an EAPI=3D0 change. Since EAPI=3D1 and EAPI=3D2= =20 are just differences to EAPI=3D0, they wouldn't be voted on. Since EAPI=3D0= =20 isn't actually approved yet, council wouldn't vote either. As it's a=20 draft standard, this would be resolved amongst package-manager=20 developers and PMS editors. --=20 Thanks, Donnie Donnie Berkholz Developer, Gentoo Linux Blog: http://dberkholz.wordpress.com --Bn2rw/3z4jIqBvZU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkjziH0ACgkQXVaO67S1rtti5wCfY6M6N5YBdn3rLwW14foEGMLj dpMAn0D5UkEtYyLaHgRqrP60n8SpoGxf =VXDC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Bn2rw/3z4jIqBvZU--