From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-33107-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1KoKMJ-0006ts-Fn
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 15:56:55 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 12721E03AD;
	Fri, 10 Oct 2008 15:56:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.186])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE122E03AD
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 15:56:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from sheridan (dslb-088-070-210-129.pools.arcor-ip.net [88.70.210.129])
	by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu3) with ESMTP (Nemesis)
	id 0MKxQS-1KoKMG1A7C-0000Z3; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 17:56:52 +0200
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 17:56:37 +0200
From: Marius Mauch <genone@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev]  Re: [RFC] New keywords for non-Gentoo Linux
 platforms
Message-Id: <20081010175637.1e5e0b5e.genone@gentoo.org>
In-Reply-To: <20081010124819.GB12145@gentoo.org>
References: <20081009181101.GE21770@gentoo.org>
	<20081010000500.b405d25b.genone@gentoo.org>
	<pan.2008.10.10.00.16.10@cox.net>
	<20081010042123.f5c2b7f9.genone@gentoo.org>
	<20081010071516.GA12145@gentoo.org>
	<m2abdcd3o2.fsf@gmail.com>
	<20081010124819.GB12145@gentoo.org>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.8 (GTK+ 2.10.14; i686-pc-mingw32)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18zjx1KDvZPAZ+P6WoI01o9jz0uH1pi33M2ywN
 vqfD9wF6H2IQWRcLK9ZKMA9Sa81iteWxmHC7QtkCHwXrlUp6xQ
 4UrXTFozPbzxoupekWUOg==
X-Archives-Salt: 18d8fd93-d4d4-4919-a00c-bf333a4aeeb9
X-Archives-Hash: d15cd2717b55504d487d03efcc95fdf4

On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 14:48:19 +0200
Fabian Groffen <grobian@gentoo.org> wrote:

> Whatever.  Some of you seem to have some quite agressive dislikement
> to it.  In the end it's just a name/tag.  I guess I could live with
> anything, including c3p0.

Well, while I dislike x64 I'm more concerned about using different
names (amd64 and x64) for the same architecture (same would apply if
you had used i386 or ia32 in some cases instead of x86) and was just
checking if there was any functional reason for that difference.

Marius