From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [69.77.167.62] (helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ko5M1-000729-7t for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 09 Oct 2008 23:55:37 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F2FB5E0982; Thu, 9 Oct 2008 23:55:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.170]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B61F3E0982 for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2008 23:55:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id m2so985036uge.39 for ; Thu, 09 Oct 2008 16:55:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type; bh=z9EDc9S5F+kvnsPtBsJdr+zno8fybQzsxhx7eQBq/io=; b=PzgeFFXR35XdIaFnKd0jHbTZ0qcSrWDFWcUsgkefE9apPW7+0t7EuEmzHNVIqH4GPR yNGQ0F1zWJW5UwuQgzorzI52PcMqwpi29jJS/IWrO2hhDEw/7cLxU0E+Z/nDoXuhwddM J8HQ5/MtDtr4QyvOBcB4BlitnVWH5Qd7aAmGQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; b=ER7j+N4p7gag9AGDGdcHaAQPZwkiLMGRkifl6tmobbMYf4UlEUnOIPYt2AMwcIjXz3 SwEXysu6XIZbk8OFVIeC3AGNOFZukLwTKFld7IRY9/KBu9OwRpoABB+TvboCEF/x1tll 9bkmGzi0jKI2oNuwdM3yHy8is1l1/AJpQXwX4= Received: by 10.210.89.4 with SMTP id m4mr940036ebb.2.1223596532239; Thu, 09 Oct 2008 16:55:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from snowmobile (92-235-187-79.cable.ubr18.edin.blueyonder.co.uk [92.235.187.79]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m5sm885800gve.3.2008.10.09.16.55.30 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 09 Oct 2008 16:55:31 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 00:55:19 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI 2 is brokened :( Message-ID: <20081010005519.0a0b5227@snowmobile> In-Reply-To: <20081009233856.GB19998@hrair.corp.631h.metaweb.com> References: <20081009195319.1f2dbcf3@googlemail.com> <48EE7BF8.7080002@gentoo.org> <20081009225313.6fdd5a70@snowmobile> <20081009222219.GA19998@hrair.corp.631h.metaweb.com> <20081009233459.5bdf52fd@snowmobile> <20081009233856.GB19998@hrair.corp.631h.metaweb.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.14.3; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/EO_Cz_YsuSyNWf8xE+WAN6b"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: ede4bca5-bde6-4f8d-b1e8-1c6b7ff42a03 X-Archives-Hash: 42530d29382c3ca055259161e8ead832 --Sig_/EO_Cz_YsuSyNWf8xE+WAN6b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 9 Oct 2008 16:38:56 -0700 Brian Harring wrote: > Of that 308, number of ebuilds that either inherit java-utils (which=20 > adds src_prepare), define their own src_prepare, or even *match*=20 > default via grepping in the ebuild is 20. Of those, and those in overlays, and those that are going to be committed over the next few weeks, how many use src_prepare to apply security related patches? > Also, if you want to bitch at me and call me incompetent do it via=20 > your blog. No one this ml cares to watch us trade blows, let=20 > alone deal with personal BS that bleeds into your posts. I'm not the one going around levelling personal attacks at everyone. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/EO_Cz_YsuSyNWf8xE+WAN6b Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkjumesACgkQ96zL6DUtXhGr+wCdF7ExFN+l57kzBihl96QuRcrp 7FAAoIbybTH36W4v1dKcEhM+OcICqv7u =NPwN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/EO_Cz_YsuSyNWf8xE+WAN6b--