From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [69.77.167.62] (helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ko3dQ-0004Qs-4I for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 09 Oct 2008 22:05:28 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 745F8E08AF; Thu, 9 Oct 2008 22:05:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.187]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 289CAE08AF for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2008 22:05:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sheridan (dslb-092-076-099-098.pools.arcor-ip.net [92.76.99.98]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu3) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MKxQS-1Ko3dN2jq5-0000qN; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 00:05:25 +0200 Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 00:05:00 +0200 From: Marius Mauch To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New keywords for non-Gentoo Linux platforms Message-Id: <20081010000500.b405d25b.genone@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <20081009181101.GE21770@gentoo.org> References: <20081009181101.GE21770@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.8 (GTK+ 2.10.14; i686-pc-mingw32) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19sU3CKNba2N56H82fKGV15xEIlC6FSm6baSu1 L7w4ZKpAm0dZFDGnz5LKa2+kVLQIXW7RlI8P+/pziXPtdxe+Hp JEWx9ShlWaz4DiayiqtBw== X-Archives-Salt: 9d374978-aecd-4077-9cd8-03d19df4f4ba X-Archives-Hash: c3b724b10ee7e27caf303e9475b05f94 On Thu, 9 Oct 2008 20:11:01 +0200 Fabian Groffen wrote: > amd64-linux > x64-openbsd > x64-solaris Is there a special reason why you're using "x64" instead of "amd64" in those cases? (IMO x64 is the most stupid name for the x86_64 architecture) Marius