From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [69.77.167.62] (helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ko11r-00075C-JG for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 09 Oct 2008 19:18:31 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8A997E081E; Thu, 9 Oct 2008 19:16:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ey-out-1920.google.com (ey-out-1920.google.com [74.125.78.145]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4804EE081E for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2008 19:16:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ey-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 4so65700eyk.10 for ; Thu, 09 Oct 2008 12:16:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type; bh=CLIdhKqTQUUM6+5rIm+MB1olZcCTKo+08GEIMnosLeE=; b=JHIGe5NS2VMwFdvAj/WZu/47kS34hQmw9reCgzjMmjnh5ya8Q349s7YyyacFtR4JhR f6FhRCooMpI04Sp97ebTe48qPKaocrtCqSvx35wnOJpnpKD5ZMQfuqVI5v2t53KJjL98 At2lOjfEnxGDqkCFe9GZNxUFg09dw/bx3YBRE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; b=nS5q6sdrrmP+XwC/Rj5ysdiAA5looQFjQ5OJU93jQzPulW5ODYEm+FLf+aAWd/xEc5 bjbN/latydIrnIjfdJCA5bBktsiIrERe8Q+47QN/X2HC4/xogk/BhZSVY696qLXeb6/N JbAbLxa5zf3qCRHM0W/KpvgN+aPRWqDwgld9E= Received: by 10.210.92.11 with SMTP id p11mr515512ebb.175.1223579788103; Thu, 09 Oct 2008 12:16:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (92-235-187-79.cable.ubr18.edin.blueyonder.co.uk [92.235.187.79]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q9sm811788gve.5.2008.10.09.12.16.26 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 09 Oct 2008 12:16:27 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 20:16:19 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for October Message-ID: <20081009201619.02987bf0@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <48EE575B.9040802@gentoo.org> References: <20081001093002.1D4C26503A@smtp.gentoo.org> <20081009142554.GA10351@comet> <20081009195525.308ce1f5@googlemail.com> <48EE575B.9040802@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.14.3; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/mpxKE=jW4g=5_G=6gxNacjz"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: a172cdf7-f7ff-4843-b343-c876ace0f4a3 X-Archives-Hash: 8553e08dafc48bf78e61444a1c99fae3 --Sig_/mpxKE=jW4g=5_G=6gxNacjz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 09 Oct 2008 12:11:23 -0700 Zac Medico wrote: > > I'm guessing it's too late to ask the Council to discuss the "EAPI > > 2 is brokened :(" thread? What would be the earliest the Council > > would be able to make a decision upon that? Unfortunately it's > > something that could get messy if left for too long. >=20 > I think that you may be overreacting. The python-2.6 ebuild from bug > 240684 is still hard masked in package.mask and I'm doing a > sys-apps/portage-2.2_rc12 release today that will fix the problem. What about pkgcore? --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/mpxKE=jW4g=5_G=6gxNacjz Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkjuWIYACgkQ96zL6DUtXhGwhwCglEu9fqWfTr+pybyHRBomPXLi jKAAoOK1GJWr0nwzhA9a9DZ1kgIj+i6q =1wCS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/mpxKE=jW4g=5_G=6gxNacjz--