From: Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] PROPERTIES=set for meta-packages that should behave like package sets
Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 00:05:53 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081004000553.71beba0f@halo.dirtyepic.sk.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 48E43749.3000304@gentoo.org
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1974 bytes --]
On Thu, 02 Oct 2008 02:51:53 +0000
"Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto" <jmbsvicetto@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Zac Medico wrote:
> > Ryan Hill wrote:
> >> Though what happens if a package is in both sets which have
> >> conflicting flags in package.use? I would say that the nested set
> >> has to have priority. If not, I can easily imagine people getting
> >> confused when their USE settings for a set are being applied to
> >> all but one or two packages.
> > It seems to me that the most logical approach would be to do some
> > sort of "incremental" stacking, similar to the way that USE flags
> > stack in the profiles. Suppose that we have the following settings
> > in package.use:
> >
> > @kde-meta foo bar
> > @kdeedu-meta -foo
> >
> > If the flags are stacked incrementally, analogously to the way that
> > they are stacked in profiles, then the above setting would apply the
> > "foo" and "bar" flags to all of @kde-meta except for the
> > @kdeedu-meta subset which would only have "bar" applied since "foo"
> > has been disabled incrementally. Does this approach seem reasonable?
> This sounds a good approach.
>
> Ryan, I disagree with your proposal. If I enable a use flag for the
> "meta" @kde and also disable it for @kdenetwork, I don't expect my
> option for the @kde "meta" to override my option for @kdenetwork.
> As Zac proposed, an incremental stack makes more sense. Before we had
> sets, when we enabled a use flag for a meta and disabled it for an
> ebuild pulled by the meta, we never expected the option for the ebuild
> to be overridden by the option for the meta.
Yes, that's what I said. ;)
The nested set's flags (@kde-network) override the parent set's flags
(@kde).
--
gcc-porting, by design, by neglect
treecleaner, for a fact or just for effect
wxwidgets @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-04 6:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-28 0:21 [gentoo-dev] [RFC] PROPERTIES=set for meta-packages that should behave like package sets Zac Medico
2008-09-28 15:24 ` Marius Mauch
2008-09-28 17:42 ` Zac Medico
2008-09-28 20:26 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2008-09-28 20:44 ` Zac Medico
2008-09-28 20:32 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2008-09-28 20:53 ` Zac Medico
2008-09-28 21:01 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2008-09-28 22:11 ` Zac Medico
2008-09-28 22:28 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2008-09-28 22:56 ` Zac Medico
2008-09-28 23:02 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2008-09-28 23:37 ` Zac Medico
2008-09-29 15:13 ` Bo Ørsted Andresen
2008-09-29 19:52 ` Zac Medico
2008-09-30 4:47 ` Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
2008-09-30 5:31 ` Zac Medico
2008-10-01 4:35 ` [gentoo-dev] " Ryan Hill
2008-10-01 16:37 ` Zac Medico
2008-10-02 2:51 ` Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
2008-10-04 6:05 ` Ryan Hill [this message]
2008-10-04 6:42 ` Ryan Hill
2008-10-04 17:17 ` Zac Medico
2008-10-05 17:55 ` Ryan Hill
2008-10-13 2:11 ` Steve Long
2008-10-02 12:19 ` Robert Bridge
2008-09-29 2:52 ` Duncan
2008-09-29 6:40 ` Zac Medico
2008-09-29 11:52 ` Duncan
2008-09-29 6:04 ` [gentoo-dev] " Rémi Cardona
2008-09-29 6:33 ` Zac Medico
2008-09-29 19:52 ` [gentoo-dev] " Steve Long
2008-09-29 20:28 ` Zac Medico
2008-09-29 20:42 ` [gentoo-dev] " Steve Long
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081004000553.71beba0f@halo.dirtyepic.sk.ca \
--to=dirtyepic@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox