On Sun, 28 Sep 2008 10:42:39 -0700 Zac Medico wrote: > Some some sort of mapping of packages into sets space does seem > better than changing the behavior of these packages other cases. > However, PROPERTIES=set will still be useful for governing > recursion, since recursion into dependencies is probably not desired > for non-meta packages in the same sense that it might be desired for > meta-packages. So you're saying that if a package depends upon all of foo, and a user wants to do a deep or empty tree reinstall, all of foo shouldn't get upgraded or reinstalled? -- Ciaran McCreesh