From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KfTge-0003MT-1t for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 16 Sep 2008 06:05:20 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D3FD1E04EF; Tue, 16 Sep 2008 06:05:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.172]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D159E04EF for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2008 06:05:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id m2so1041817uge.39 for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2008 23:05:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type; bh=+v5ny7Xr5OapO2h9z2+JtRP6jKI0Y1RiaCPb3P6Vvtk=; b=altvT+QJV9TObuVReWTuwBbRcIQ1yUAVQJVKA4J/gLyKupJZ7tfzID/YiccedoX1Ki lRDWYuqUREN35duHBR0k4Y+h0rNLxI5h+qIJut0/+BCFxI9gV2I0+nKbln6jH6c1rowp kvikrav9SYvbI74r27tpPIaG6ccP+a5hug1h4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; b=qvIMsQRd6A1AEMriWGiUbbWAHdPSQs1SNjPo22xKqh1hxJzPalNbt/7efXHALELk+/ EyxvLGYOuJxBqnFCV7ak29csHDjQuKTb8IWKQoFyjKfvpeaE8rFCBjwTadk6CB5rulIU pVfprndjW7U1mDGMdmK9iQRA1HmNuULl62vco= Received: by 10.66.241.4 with SMTP id o4mr112878ugh.89.1221545117240; Mon, 15 Sep 2008 23:05:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ( [92.235.187.79]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e33sm9726430ugd.15.2008.09.15.23.05.15 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 15 Sep 2008 23:05:16 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2008 07:05:09 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Preventing $ARCH flags in USE Message-ID: <20080916070509.47b0ed7d@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <20080916060146.GL22844@gentoo.org> References: <48CEBB5B.8020507@gentoo.org> <3c32af40809151301k4d38e79eu68df25a26917613f@mail.gmail.com> <48CEC387.9000200@gentoo.org> <20080916060146.GL22844@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.12.11; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/mNds_z54qLYH4cfPDiPIvX1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: 7a6cc5bd-9c84-4839-9245-fdf8f3923075 X-Archives-Hash: 0567e36e1f05d61a82df6e2019c7d868 --Sig_/mNds_z54qLYH4cfPDiPIvX1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 16 Sep 2008 08:01:46 +0200 Fabian Groffen wrote: > > While I don't necessarily disagree with you, my impression is that > > most people tend to think that certain profile-specific flags such > > as userland_* and kernel_* should be considered as implicit members > > of IUSE and therefore they shouldn't be explicitly listed in in > > IUSE. >=20 > Yes, IMO mainly because they should never explicitly be set by users, > so they shouldn't get a hint they can set it either. That's covered by USE_EXPAND_HIDDEN... --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/mNds_z54qLYH4cfPDiPIvX1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkjPTJcACgkQ96zL6DUtXhEwAwCgrtttxaRBi5LnZ1DLQU7CRz7E JmgAn0evUEas8xxLKBj5IzstSCYbaNHf =LQyU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/mNds_z54qLYH4cfPDiPIvX1--