On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 12:06:35 -0700
Zac Medico <zmedico@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > So are all zero-install-cost metapackages virtuals now? What about,
> > for instance, kde-base/kde?
> 
> Looking at the dependencies of kde-base/kde, it seems like it would
> be eligible to exhibit the "virtual" property. Perhaps it wouldn't
> be very useful in this particular case, but it doesn't seem like it
> would hurt anything either. So, I think it's probably fine to keep
> the definition as it is and allow things like kde-base/kde to
> exhibit the "virtual" property.

Then change the name. Call it "zero-install-cost".

-- 
Ciaran McCreesh