From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KQIJG-0007w3-PX for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 05 Aug 2008 08:54:27 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E10D7E0227; Tue, 5 Aug 2008 08:54:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ik-out-1112.google.com (ik-out-1112.google.com [66.249.90.180]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4BD9E0227 for ; Tue, 5 Aug 2008 08:54:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ik-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id c21so2918366ika.2 for ; Tue, 05 Aug 2008 01:54:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type; bh=IcmbDIwR9NnMNT2kviKxZMu5Or/D8hfrBb6dl3qZtAU=; b=JwRk90HBzAebF4MFG0yeCZk0DRlw7f4LBk67ni87wSBiR5YJeVOMgOo3WyPW4YKN99 iBLifKc6mrPJJlYEjLRAD+6ER2MHtDwKXsR+8tCi/PDpoDcECPcjaFudq/0WZqrQ5TEU yF9giphaGw13Y7tPHEfKd8Zn6R/8r5VZIUlO0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; b=RdN83RxPAxJx7PkRPcl56NG3/2Dw5VpvS8+J1TYxfMiANunBaZfYSipGl6KNHCsPM2 UpM0vIdZtFN6B7wWezgst3/PJ73GW6SPP2i92AGARKjBk90ZPsb/9mNDQD4yAThGc8Ec 2ZLON9pW8NYwv8YjzmnDPdpVt1OkM78dmE6Vs= Received: by 10.210.59.14 with SMTP id h14mr754178eba.104.1217926463894; Tue, 05 Aug 2008 01:54:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from snowcone ( [92.235.187.79]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t2sm13545955gve.9.2008.08.05.01.54.23 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 05 Aug 2008 01:54:23 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 09:54:12 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [SECURITY] Minimizing the suid usage Message-ID: <20080805095412.20a34d82@snowcone> In-Reply-To: <20080805105109.13425b14@pluto.restena.lu> References: <9e0cf0bf0803231121t75eb67abu60f17f54086dd32@mail.gmail.com> <20080805105109.13425b14@pluto.restena.lu> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.12.11; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/k+k9ep=bYcgwMflrXEjEwDE"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: 19cc08ab-2e12-43fe-8672-8e32dc96bb18 X-Archives-Hash: e097b441f3805dc9cd46f60d89540e57 --Sig_/k+k9ep=bYcgwMflrXEjEwDE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 5 Aug 2008 10:51:09 +0200 Bruno Pr=C3=A9mont wrote: > Has any progress happened since March for adding support for > FILE_CAPABILITIES? Well, Alon still hasn't backed up his claim that Portage supports capabilities... Fairly important to establish that before anything else... --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/k+k9ep=bYcgwMflrXEjEwDE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkiYFToACgkQ96zL6DUtXhHC/ACgrsh+J9JTE6ms/9hn38px23// ZSQAn3yuSUbM/5l0hU1XSfb+FnJWm5kj =7YPJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/k+k9ep=bYcgwMflrXEjEwDE--