From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KJqtI-0001PB-Dy for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 18 Jul 2008 14:25:00 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A605DE0369; Fri, 18 Jul 2008 14:24:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mirapoint.uc.edu (mirapoint.uc.edu [129.137.3.50]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 838A0E0369 for ; Fri, 18 Jul 2008 14:24:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from mirapoint.uc.edu [10.23.4.253]) by mirapoint.uc.edu (MOS 3.8.7a) with HTTPS/1.1 id CHL97157 (AUTH stylinae); Fri, 18 Jul 2008 10:24:58 -0400 (EDT) From: Adam Stylinski Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: ICC Profile To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Mailer: Mirapoint Webmail Direct 3.8.7a Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20080718102458.CHL97157@mirapoint.uc.edu> Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 10:24:58 -0400 (EDT) X-Archives-Salt: 61c165ff-daf4-41ce-87af-962c07d2322e X-Archives-Hash: 487dd2740e1fc6507399da79ec3b4c6e GCC 4.3 is catching up, but they are no where near utilizing SSE4 or SSE5 instructions. http://blog.alphagemini.org/2008/03/icc-vs-gcc-43.html He concludes that it's not worth pursuing, but I beg to differ. Those are signifcant differences for a processor. -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list