From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KIovc-0000XT-7l for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 15 Jul 2008 18:07:08 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0536DE0498; Tue, 15 Jul 2008 18:07:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.169]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC09AE0498 for ; Tue, 15 Jul 2008 18:07:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id z27so426444ugc.49 for ; Tue, 15 Jul 2008 11:07:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type; bh=a9UmFzRc/sKQNhYEDfZKoP8ek/vaWEcVWtn8/vGgatI=; b=uG/88v29IAcEWiGDLBat095ZQvYHc/P5Ta2sFzpz9EogwEEIvS3deDOWhGhHs/6Izg 8hxxgxlq4f3qnUioJdmiy2+uqKPiYB6y4V1g5pSIdfveorlrY8Uwy7yaK8mX/YEHmSyH 964za23WwSKKgty2CUxLdgoG/CE9cUUBqunhc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; b=ki/Zx780E58gwV0qiKUR3EHvQsN3KefNohLSrpmxHA5oNU7JyKni74uFa6Aevt5I1u 7aaA6kbvOfPNPgJIXBkIIeepxQrhSSCFqX+ihIn4zS2Wz4R+fRJfJMTFcMdkNW9tAzsZ GR5oj7gpogqjG2S1BHjeNL6y5YRBaeXFRjXVs= Received: by 10.67.119.8 with SMTP id w8mr2558418ugm.20.1216145225943; Tue, 15 Jul 2008 11:07:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from snowcone ( [92.235.187.79]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m1sm9487454uge.17.2008.07.15.11.07.05 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 15 Jul 2008 11:07:05 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 19:06:59 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Council meeting summary for 10 July 2008 Message-ID: <20080715190659.3c83fd95@snowcone> In-Reply-To: <487CE54C.7040204@gentoo.org> References: <20080713071118.GC1891@comet> <20080713235255.0e2b7f8e@googlemail.com> <20080714002117.731f1408@googlemail.com> <487CC909.6040109@gentoo.org> <20080715171152.4ffb64b9@snowcone> <487CCD6A.4030804@gentoo.org> <487CE54C.7040204@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.12.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/==Y=QfQ7nb6zGO/HigjDMh+"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: aa63fe43-ea4c-4a17-b498-c48c13324c48 X-Archives-Hash: 598ad8a884261acd84bb1c50de92749c --Sig_/==Y=QfQ7nb6zGO/HigjDMh+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 13:58:36 -0400 Richard Freeman wrote: > Would it be more constructive to create a list of new=20 > features/capabilities that depend on this GLEP. For each I'd define: >=20 > 1. The feature/unmet need. > 2. Why it can't be done or can only be done poorly without the new > GLEP. 3. When we're likely to see the feature become available > assuming the GLEP were approved. > 4. What package managers are likely to implement it. (Ie their=20 > maintainers endorse the need. >=20 > It sounds like this list might already have some items on it - so why=20 > not document them? The GLEP already documents what needs it, in the broadest reasonable terms. The problem with specifics is that everyone will then start arguing about how exactly, say, per-cat/pkg eclasses would work, which is irrelevant to the GLEP. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/==Y=QfQ7nb6zGO/HigjDMh+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkh850YACgkQ96zL6DUtXhFm9ACgvhM8z5a8yjYfG0Z2BxVFZG47 iYMAoJym6aZeeRFHzejf0+YCoAnp9bze =Gzhm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/==Y=QfQ7nb6zGO/HigjDMh+-- -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list