From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KInqy-0006tS-8N for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 15 Jul 2008 16:58:16 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C73A4E05E8; Tue, 15 Jul 2008 16:58:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.171]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 897CEE05E8 for ; Tue, 15 Jul 2008 16:58:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id z27so417670ugc.49 for ; Tue, 15 Jul 2008 09:58:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type; bh=G1AUe8BU4QDOsytr002sAfyNKci2aQS/40dgrm8zX58=; b=rJ+RCw9dcnTyK+yBmWZMcEY1NmtwKLpEatRIK4q67cpFEvPtPUDrbBYTiUSGAxQEfC LK0M1AKo6bENda/7/Z8zHvmD1fYNuSH1DlUid0CtG27p/3xLi/iV+GvvnOrIVvhoNA++ OeIVnuJqnBe1eKG9lblzn95Ylsv1240ZY4yYk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; b=pdrW+HmUa28IveU0tJ0sh9rNoY+qua5KOo2oTG9JhAV9p68KUzGyRmfIQQzVjhWoPe Xl3Dib2mtGiqp8YTmGYWxeU7KEwV/qmioXhAqiV4cIu/RmtgsB+g2DGKZvtRGCVnW4Yo HnXGpqt0DxL8768pO3kasa9bzbySQrztpo3PY= Received: by 10.67.106.13 with SMTP id i13mr2517219ugm.37.1216141093703; Tue, 15 Jul 2008 09:58:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from snowcone ( [92.235.187.79]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e23sm8276135ugd.47.2008.07.15.09.58.13 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 15 Jul 2008 09:58:13 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 17:58:07 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Council meeting summary for 10 July 2008 Message-ID: <20080715175807.4c9f52a7@snowcone> In-Reply-To: <487CCD6A.4030804@gentoo.org> References: <20080713071118.GC1891@comet> <20080713235255.0e2b7f8e@googlemail.com> <20080714002117.731f1408@googlemail.com> <487CC909.6040109@gentoo.org> <20080715171152.4ffb64b9@snowcone> <487CCD6A.4030804@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.12.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/xI7S.2ZDgRX9F=QY.cIGRtf"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: 59c00f29-7a6f-46c9-97e0-fcd80caecf16 X-Archives-Hash: 560d99d7ad055397a682f99a621bb326 --Sig_/xI7S.2ZDgRX9F=QY.cIGRtf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 19:16:42 +0300 Petteri R=C3=A4ty wrote: > > So you're saying the GLEP's of no use until Portage supports them, > > but Portage can't support them until you say yes to the GLEP... >=20 > I am saying that it makes sense to approve both at the same time or > have other official package managers approved before accepting the > GLEP. Why? We know it's a not-too-distant future need. Might as well get it out of the way now so there isn't more than an hour's worth of stuff all needing to be approved at the same time. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/xI7S.2ZDgRX9F=QY.cIGRtf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkh81yIACgkQ96zL6DUtXhE15ACgkG5/qJSL6QbE0kuH17xZO6SP 27gAoKdHZydHsUINzhtWcSY/yeSkGPUc =5jN4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/xI7S.2ZDgRX9F=QY.cIGRtf-- -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list