From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KIAsl-0008FK-E1 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 13 Jul 2008 23:21:31 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D9582E021B; Sun, 13 Jul 2008 23:21:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.185]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F691E021B for ; Sun, 13 Jul 2008 23:21:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id c7so1292207nfi.26 for ; Sun, 13 Jul 2008 16:21:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type; bh=hFg1gkEwXRwhkq2rcg6XPXrTVCv9nj+3xF59QtqNcSo=; b=BkhOWiq7Al8thibvwEsdCbtQ7dtd0wuPtQOuj9qRKkxTz9qIbj+H99U4o2JbZMbjdz YCvQnsb6NSf91XR/xMxk2ENQaSr4PKoe2b0S3NJkuDROVBtOopnkIaxUQeC53ILzKk2a gKp7/epID94c7Y7PfC6YYFvOs5Vz33Q/0knts= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; b=tzN0kAO8VXVDqDj5OleIRVhjWSUcbjHHMLuiOMXL8r7/3wWbd3IIwwUyXIf1B2UicP Citokw6xryCsGkPgklSfrJgOrgY5L+emuW32OEr4zWN/UeM6nFrr6x2j+9zA8VMqJcsG bruEQzmi3ENtK2gXyHZEYVuUSxw26VsCoxL/4= Received: by 10.210.52.9 with SMTP id z9mr8467280ebz.139.1215991288889; Sun, 13 Jul 2008 16:21:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ( [92.235.187.79]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y34sm5587139iky.10.2008.07.13.16.21.28 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 13 Jul 2008 16:21:28 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 00:21:17 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Council meeting summary for 10 July 2008 Message-ID: <20080714002117.731f1408@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20080713071118.GC1891@comet> <20080713235255.0e2b7f8e@googlemail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.4.0 (GTK+ 2.12.9; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/U.0.II+4H/UobH2nyxeh3u8"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: 69bf5071-bd4a-4f6b-b551-c3922864af64 X-Archives-Hash: 4d56d8169a5e42cf5bf4cb619682c1f0 --Sig_/U.0.II+4H/UobH2nyxeh3u8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 16:16:23 -0700 "Alec Warner" wrote: > As far as could be determined by the members at the meeting there no > compelling examples in Gentoo who to change or add global scope > functions in future EAPIs. As such those problems as stated are not > in scope for Gentoo because Gentoo is not attempting to do those > things at this time. You mean you don't want per-category/package eclasses, or eclasses that can indicate that they only work with some EAPIs, or eclasses that can indicate that they're being used incorrectly, or the death of EXPORT_FUNCTIONS? All of these have been discussed as desirable future extensions. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/U.0.II+4H/UobH2nyxeh3u8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkh6jfUACgkQ96zL6DUtXhG/4wCfZPWM3TKJDWCYGO1pSzGZYvvg nyQAoMFeks4CGqq/KJj3fUDFj3KlzzIo =eUHC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/U.0.II+4H/UobH2nyxeh3u8-- -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list