From: Matti Bickel <mabi@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: 0-day bump requests
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 00:38:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080710223818.GA7297@pluto> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1215148024.22222.4.camel@ip6-localhost>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1225 bytes --]
Hans de Graaff <graaff@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-07-04 at 02:31 +0200, Marius Mauch wrote:
> > On Fri, 4 Jul 2008 01:16:09 +0200
> > Jeroen Roovers <jer@gentoo.org> wrote:
> >
> > Disclaimer: I'm not really a package maintainer anymore.
>
> I am, and Marius said all the things that I would have said. :-)
AOL here. For the few packages i maintain, i'm on all relevant channels
to be notified of updates in time. But i appreciate user feedback on
bumps, for most of the time they come with patches or complete ebuilds.
(thanks guys, you're fantastic)
I certainly want to stress the "wording" part of marius' mail.
The bump request i dealt with are "patch attached" kind of stuff. That's
not annoying, that shows the user's caring and i appreciate that very
much. Especially if the bump is critical i like timely feedback on it,
in a "hey, this has been out for some days, fixes issue X, which is
kind of important to me, could we have a bump in the tree?" kind of way.
I DO get annoyed by "package X has a bugfix release out 5 hours now, why
isn't it in the tree yet!!?" - but i don't get those bump requests...
--
Regards, Matti Bickel
Signed/Encrypted email preferred (key 4849EC6C)
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-10 22:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-03 23:16 [gentoo-dev] RFC: 0-day bump requests Jeroen Roovers
2008-07-03 23:26 ` Tony "Chainsaw" Vroon
2008-07-03 23:30 ` Joe Peterson
2008-07-03 23:52 ` Thomas Anderson
2008-07-04 0:08 ` Torsten Rehn
2008-07-04 0:35 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2008-07-04 6:57 ` Christian Faulhammer
2008-07-04 17:12 ` [gentoo-dev] " Jeroen Roovers
2008-07-04 18:30 ` Robin H. Johnson
2008-07-04 20:05 ` [gentoo-dev] " Tiziano Müller
2008-07-04 0:31 ` [gentoo-dev] " Marius Mauch
2008-07-04 5:07 ` Hans de Graaff
2008-07-04 6:48 ` Gilles Dartiguelongue
2008-07-10 22:38 ` Matti Bickel [this message]
2008-07-04 1:09 ` Luis Francisco Araujo
2008-07-04 1:58 ` [gentoo-dev] " Sven Köhler
2008-07-04 7:39 ` [gentoo-dev] " Petteri Räty
2008-07-04 8:13 ` Ferris McCormick
2008-07-04 8:38 ` Marijn Schouten (hkBst)
2008-07-04 13:42 ` Luca Barbato
2008-07-07 14:10 ` Jim Ramsay
2008-07-07 15:33 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2008-07-07 18:11 ` Steev Klimaszewski
2008-07-07 23:05 ` Ryan Hill
2008-07-08 13:19 ` Jim Ramsay
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080710223818.GA7297@pluto \
--to=mabi@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox