From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KGcZz-0001LS-9w for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 09 Jul 2008 16:31:43 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 63147E053B; Wed, 9 Jul 2008 16:31:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DF55E053B for ; Wed, 9 Jul 2008 16:31:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gentoo.org (xray.science.oregonstate.edu [128.193.220.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C38D767C35 for ; Wed, 9 Jul 2008 16:31:39 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 09:31:38 -0700 From: Donnie Berkholz To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for July Message-ID: <20080709163138.GA7323@comet> References: <20080701093002.CFAB6670F5@smtp.gentoo.org> <20080709084013.GC684@comet> <71ac8a310807090407q317c74ft5aa891161b87917d@mail.gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <71ac8a310807090407q317c74ft5aa891161b87917d@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Archives-Salt: c7c1fa33-2384-4aa5-bfe9-044e12cf3108 X-Archives-Hash: 04badc10ee71e394d27bc0c5b3792472 --r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 13:07 Wed 09 Jul , Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: > You forgot about voting on adding some flags to default LDFLAGS. > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/57163/focus=3D57193 > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/57092/focus=3D57169 There was no real debate about that (the only question was where), and=20 Cardoe said this morning that he was just going to commit it. If people=20 had any problems, they would've posted them to the thread. --=20 Thanks, Donnie Donnie Berkholz Developer, Gentoo Linux Blog: http://dberkholz.wordpress.com --r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkh05+oACgkQXVaO67S1rtsmPQCeOnFeCYic+rGYp9tqrh774IgN RQ0AoP7ixoKYw6aJtLHVgohkCblpZS3k =8a0+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3-- -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list