From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K75Uk-0004P5-Ep for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 13 Jun 2008 09:22:54 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DB05EE0632; Fri, 13 Jun 2008 09:22:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.172]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EDF9E0632 for ; Fri, 13 Jun 2008 09:22:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id z27so50229ugc.49 for ; Fri, 13 Jun 2008 02:22:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type; bh=GrufjIjlk/itZaGhU52M3ylPPXhiZroFFdppmQsvor0=; b=BfVcO/ShkdLgvXU7W9XlmVKZzMdj3F9RiQvoY7MNtVxkZ64wQebJsKrteksWo1mAUD VO/Fdr27sgFcq1U+MoPLOF0a6ff8btheNtQunDaOtDoYiyV1EFQCCqK93kR8uP5X9lm0 yHT0z3m/L3vzKkdxu1RT586zrI0AOp8v0LiTc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; b=OuHpCWVR/l8o5RW26yT0FpmZfPIfBAp/tm2m+zxIHSX1kLoNXBG5kx/Y2pijdxknJZ eTsn4IbGux5w7Z823mwKeSYMyJ7UmZJGGYnqgE02ETiGQmaPTZTjwhbuyffZSDzKchTQ q7GM84vtzhl574Y8SQKrnpGNwdLS1cO66WB54= Received: by 10.67.93.16 with SMTP id v16mr667991ugl.55.1213348971988; Fri, 13 Jun 2008 02:22:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ( [213.121.151.206]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k1sm985542ugf.5.2008.06.13.02.22.51 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 13 Jun 2008 02:22:51 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 10:22:40 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Agenda [WAS: One-Day Gentoo Council Reminder for June] Message-ID: <20080613102240.4ba5d144@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <48523AEF.2020608@dev.gentooexperimental.org> References: <20080611070618.54E4066E24@smtp.gentoo.org> <20080612212148.GB14670@basestar> <200806122258.26896.levertond@googlemail.com> <75f3dce80806121813y5d417574kb7283c285e296562@mail.gmail.com> <20080613062612.46931b33@googlemail.com> <4852375F.7010201@dev.gentooexperimental.org> <7DB0FAE7-6F92-43D5-BB33-0048403A0281@gentoo.org> <48523AEF.2020608@dev.gentooexperimental.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.4.0 (GTK+ 2.12.9; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/T5Es/A8mCGTuvssoKAiFgke"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: a497d1ec-feb8-48a4-9a6c-ad4d8bf6e1bc X-Archives-Hash: ebd33de10396a86b6b3db293c8eff5b4 --Sig_/T5Es/A8mCGTuvssoKAiFgke Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 11:16:31 +0200 Patrick Lauer wrote: > > Yes, we are aware of that bug in a feature we consider highly=20 > > experimental. > > Hmm, I'd have guessed config files are moderately relevant. You didn't notice the large warning telling you not to use Portage config files? > And why don't y'all fix a bug like that? We do what PMS requires regarding handling of inline comments (which is the same as what some EAPI 0 accepting Portage versions do, so PMS can't allow inline comments), and indicate an error (rather than writing junk, as older Portage did) when inline comments are used. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/T5Es/A8mCGTuvssoKAiFgke Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkhSPGMACgkQ96zL6DUtXhG/lQCfbFfkL4Ik9YP++jfhBjGBxmy2 GlAAoKrT2ZWvSZPU+d9Csf6nlB4zlWgi =fbBv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/T5Es/A8mCGTuvssoKAiFgke-- -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list