From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K6sFL-0000bl-5B for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 12 Jun 2008 19:14:07 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D8344E0460; Thu, 12 Jun 2008 19:14:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1B24E0460 for ; Thu, 12 Jun 2008 19:14:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gentoo.org (c-71-193-142-160.hsd1.or.comcast.net [71.193.142.160]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24366650DA for ; Thu, 12 Jun 2008 19:14:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 12:14:00 -0700 From: Donnie Berkholz To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-council] Re: [gentoo-dev] One-Day Gentoo Council Reminder for June Message-ID: <20080612191400.GH9607@comet> References: <20080611070618.54E4066E24@smtp.gentoo.org> <20080611111133.GA6803@seldon.hsd1.ca.comcast.net> <20080612170943.GE9607@comet> <200806121314.22691.vapier@gentoo.org> <20080612190336.237b1eee@googlemail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080612190336.237b1eee@googlemail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-Archives-Salt: 03b1e058-9b08-4451-91b6-22586b9557fe X-Archives-Hash: 4f4c4dfb5b3acf274d9ceda41ec04042 On 19:03 Thu 12 Jun , Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 13:14:21 -0400 > Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Thursday 12 June 2008, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > > > On 04:11 Wed 11 Jun , Brian Harring wrote: > > > > Reiterating the early request, I'd like the council to please > > > > discuss the current status of PMS, > > > > > > People actually working on the PMS would be better-placed to > > > discuss its current status, if by that you mean progress toward an > > > approved spec. The last I heard was a couple months ago when Ciaran > > > asked us whether there were any further major issues and removed > > > kdebuild-1 from the PDF to be approved. > > > > he was told to remove kdebuild-1 from the repo and this has yet to > > happen > > No, I was told to remove kdebuild-1 from the version sent to the > Council for approval. Doing so is just a case of toggling a switch in > PMS. > > Also, until they were all mysteriously fired, Gentoo's KDE people were > planning to ask the Council for official approval of kdebuild-1 so that > it could remain in PMS. So that's still up in the air too. All? Only one person I know of, Philantrop. Were rbrown or spb committing much to KDE stuff? > > > I'd like to know what's holding you back from contributing to it, > > > instead of telling us that someone else is doing things you don't > > > like. Is there some kind of technical barrier (like the TeX)? Or > > > what? Are you filing bugs against the parts you don't like? What's > > > happening to them? > > > > TeX isnt a format that integrates with Gentoo. should just convert > > it to docbook and be done with this garbage. > > And docbook does integrate with Gentoo? Please point me to other Gentoo > documentation that uses docbook. http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/portage/main/trunk/doc/ http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-projects/pax-utils/man/ > Also, I've yet to be told how to get automatic, verified, > zero-work-upon-relocation cross-document links using either docbook or > guidexml. Perhaps you'd care to explain. You've mentioned this as a requirement. Is it something that happens so often that it's a significant burden if it isn't available? Thanks, Donnie -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list