Re: [gentoo-council] Re: [gentoo-dev] One-Day Gentoo Council Reminder for June

[David Leverton <levertond@googlemail.com>]

On Thursday 12 June 2008 18:14:21 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> he was told to remove kdebuild-1 from the repo and this has yet to happen

I just checked the April meeting log, and while I admit I didn't read every 
word from start to finish, all I could see was that kdebuild couldn't be in 
the final, official version.  In particular, you yourself wrote:

22:36 <    vapier@> i generate the pms for reference.  it better not include 
anything that hasnt been approved.

It looks like that isn't the default in current git, but it's trivial to fix 
if that's what people want.

If I missed something in the log, or if this was discussed somewhere else, 
please let me know.

> TeX isnt a format that integrates with Gentoo.  should just convert it to
> docbook and be done with this garbage.

I would think that anyone proposing such a disruptive change at this point 
should either give a damn good reason or do the work themselves, preferably 
both.  I can't even figure out what "integrates with Gentoo" means, let alone 
decide whether it counts as "damn good".  (And if you're suggesting DocBook 
as an alternative, it can't possibly mean "is the same as all the other 
Gentoo documentation".)
-- 
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list