From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K6hRB-0006vK-Mw for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 12 Jun 2008 07:41:37 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D2D43E04FA; Thu, 12 Jun 2008 07:41:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.169]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98CEFE04FA for ; Thu, 12 Jun 2008 07:41:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id z27so288386ugc.49 for ; Thu, 12 Jun 2008 00:41:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type; bh=QYtVew6vlMAad06cB14s9AMHW7sQa+9JSF/Ftn/WgLw=; b=Jw7kEqrG9V60E4UH4ZrlXImdOIEI2UI0GU1jUwlD2Y53o0p9M30PJ2EMQr5qcvoZcb bGrK13GDOFfaB7e0EBJ+lNLo5QLDEk9pDZk+/iifADeOrqSTfQfjHvfqEqKrc9HKAlgl 8TiQf24kDQUGV2bLgkWLWqZqNGVvbLvyNOWSE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; b=Vm1CqszHfQcX08t/V9zZUCIJce0pt0kG/IImqT4+9UYPbXmVs2/2DXf9oC/rvNa5Uo 1+gPAFLmJCqa7uKAOzR25sQE7NllxaaDt73KsoHZXEQBzlBvUgpZvqWsbI8h8THkqDc+ HEg1PXy2p/lBubKbl5CPcLYfExlFBD4o8333k= Received: by 10.67.16.13 with SMTP id t13mr1350686ugi.64.1213256494528; Thu, 12 Jun 2008 00:41:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ( [213.121.151.206]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k28sm6527289ugd.41.2008.06.12.00.41.34 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 12 Jun 2008 00:41:34 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 08:41:28 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Agenda [WAS: One-Day Gentoo Council Reminder for June] Message-ID: <20080612084128.7221bb09@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20080611070618.54E4066E24@smtp.gentoo.org> <20080611215827.GB7074@comet> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.3.1 (GTK+ 2.12.9; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/l3C7LQl1uFk76PGv1e/09sX"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: 007fe588-cfb8-4fe6-9308-f8a0c90e0765 X-Archives-Hash: fe88ef273bc61e48ff4a529d5a84bade --Sig_/l3C7LQl1uFk76PGv1e/09sX Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 09:36:18 +0200 Markus Ullmann wrote: > After investing more than two hours to just read the Mails that > popped up yesterday regarding this stuff, I'd say we can't really > take this serious. The PMS maintainers were withholding information > on compatibility issues they've seen. No, we were trying to get the pkgcore people to write some frickin' test cases for their code rather than continuing to screw up the process by incorrectly claiming support for an EAPI. You should instead be asking the pkgcore guys why they should be allowed to continue keeping a package in the tree when they're blatantly ignoring the EAPI process. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/l3C7LQl1uFk76PGv1e/09sX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkhQ0ysACgkQ96zL6DUtXhE58ACfZcitnOpoVkrwuppfCrIAA3eE 86MAn2qDh8d1ia55wDeSammXGx4D3qYn =ktYf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/l3C7LQl1uFk76PGv1e/09sX-- -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list