From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K6VyX-0000KA-4t for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 19:27:17 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B9BA7E0691; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 19:27:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from amun.cheops.ods.org (amun.cheops.ods.org [82.95.138.191]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 905A4E0691 for ; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 19:27:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tefnut.cheops.ods.org ([2001:888:1022:0:211:24ff:fe37:e46e] helo=gentoo.org) by amun.cheops.ods.org with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1K6VyT-0003Zp-VH for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 21:27:14 +0200 Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 21:27:13 +0200 From: Fabian Groffen To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI-2 - Let's get it started Message-ID: <20080611192713.GK1163@gentoo.org> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <484EAB4F.6070608@gentoo.org> <20080611214603.2f41fbde@altair.jimramsay.com> <200806111900.16967.levertond@googlemail.com> <200806112024.18304.roy@marples.name> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200806112024.18304.roy@marples.name> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (Darwin 8.11.0, VIM - Vi IMproved 7.1) Organization: Gentoo Foundation, Inc. X-Content-Scanned: by amun.cheops.ods.org (Exim Exiscan) using SpamAssassin and ClamAV X-Archives-Salt: e44f1663-003c-4a22-970f-c35e92724dde X-Archives-Hash: d0cac249ef989a4a22f0fdcf4686d078 On 11-06-2008 20:24:18 +0100, Roy Marples wrote: > On Wednesday 11 June 2008 19:00:16 David Leverton wrote: > > On Thursday 12 June 2008 02:46:03 Jim Ramsay wrote: > > > David Leverton wrote: > > > > Since at least one ebuild has already been modified specifically to > > > > work around the bug, I'd say it's pretty real. > > > > > > For those of us trying to play along at home, which one is this? > > > > http://tinyurl.com/4w4t69 > > Why the need for EAPI=1? > A cursory glance shows nothing unusual. slot deps -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list