From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K6QPX-00068s-76 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 13:30:47 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AAC9BE0629; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 13:30:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.168]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70F5AE0629 for ; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 13:30:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id z27so105896ugc.49 for ; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 06:30:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; bh=tpe5BP5WolZZ1ss81JKnCB6PFpvOG0zKXKNrizz90zI=; b=txtLOhGpunysOyMBYzRgu8z107FcHQno7fweA7Xa7fClxHSIkrs0nSAZ1MOtkEe2qa aV7CmApS/8F1QlyXyd1QLb/TTD6M7eQCtGZ/yYatlBTvEnyk2Ne9lKZf9+Am76Eqzc7i 0IBCwidCPb95A1R8XfEagDiLgCslmc2Ow8qoA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :message-id; b=EAOTPMKldgYrd1znLU5gO+04LZ9ceGgLoS+5LZOu+876RJ+Yy0xVWGAXb1ipJZGw7E QI9nWFmsrnBaiRxDyNAXzTk1s4lKbHT2Tv/cXaGTSst4BL51jZEN2tIXKTWJouo9kj/m h6oUOx9rnPY9glwcsS6Sxm7LLySCiTvCH/ZNM= Received: by 10.210.73.4 with SMTP id v4mr5201979eba.2.1213191039415; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 06:30:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from shiny-one.home ( [81.158.32.93]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t2sm16721452gve.9.2008.06.11.06.30.37 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 11 Jun 2008 06:30:38 -0700 (PDT) From: David Leverton To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI-2 - Let's get it started Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 14:30:34 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 References: <484EAB4F.6070608@gentoo.org> <484FCE28.8070905@bernd-steinhauser.de> <484FD137.8090906@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <484FD137.8090906@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200806111430.35116.levertond@googlemail.com> X-Archives-Salt: 8836c958-a81e-4bc2-ba99-6212f219aa38 X-Archives-Hash: 579380efc693e068b065a8e84f8e5a05 On Wednesday 11 June 2008 14:20:55 Luca Barbato wrote: > Bernd Steinhauser wrote: > > And that wasn't the point. He pointed out, that there is an issue, that > > hasn't been caught because of missing tests. > > That may or may not exist Since at least one ebuild has already been modified specifically to work around the bug, I'd say it's pretty real. > > It really doesn't matter how it is specified. You have an implementation > > of it and should make sure, that this implementation works. > > Seems to works well enough for people using it. Unfortunately, that's not really saying much. -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list