From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K6JGk-0002cC-2c for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 05:53:14 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8366AE050D; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 05:53:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.168]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44D27E050D for ; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 05:53:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id z27so20583ugc.49 for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2008 22:53:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type; bh=WPoLmg+lZmOwEpwnk4pe7mAOcRlu+gukGFNQaCuC0ks=; b=WwHW7lg2/7B3SmJmuHov/RbJvhXN/wvcuSeXdIxu8SdvBMAZau1FU7eSseALKsj4kj JG6rbnoexqsGVaHF/pQuC41bTi5WxKFlRgE0bEL1TI2KUvVVB61sNXwJMGsIQ/xzMyXl dpGmBJsx62vq1WCe/QtV6R8j/rfc4FbSyHKpw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; b=N8r+7qaRk0AlVhUiPP/sU/P0WajprLcx2Lctm+mLdPUKv47C9UZDbFr1TZgpPfzCfH F6vItyCQiQJGPZC0IIHwUcIxUCuFIUpkVCeozaFy5QqgqDEejEmOsdUkLDt1rbee87L0 q6agTZ+mpkQXwkCrs7GdXgvjeGrbZLLTysAe4= Received: by 10.66.232.10 with SMTP id e10mr916486ugh.24.1213163591635; Tue, 10 Jun 2008 22:53:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ( [213.121.151.206]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b35sm3262439ugd.51.2008.06.10.22.53.11 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 10 Jun 2008 22:53:11 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 06:53:06 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI-2 - Let's get it started Message-ID: <20080611065306.0f3f9694@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <484F6716.1070105@gentoo.org> References: <484EAB4F.6070608@gentoo.org> <200806110011.41718.zlin@gentoo.org> <20080611010347.6ced7db2@sheridan.genone.homeip.net> <200806110142.38384.zlin@gentoo.org> <484F5372.80301@gentoo.org> <20080611062006.5d517d71@googlemail.com> <484F6716.1070105@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.3.1 (GTK+ 2.12.9; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/4fifH51.tROWAp4BjaQgYVX"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: 6a46502c-462a-453a-845a-5c090abd79fa X-Archives-Hash: cb0926eb7d5a6de6f8265c4807e8bec4 --Sig_/4fifH51.tROWAp4BjaQgYVX Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 07:48:06 +0200 Luca Barbato wrote: > Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 06:24:18 +0200 > > Luca Barbato wrote: > >> People will (and should) have -test in FEATURES anyway, good > >> self-test suites usually take more than twice the time to build and > >> run, may have additional dependencies that could take lots of time. > >=20 > > So how are we supposed to handle packages where upstream *require* > > that anyone building from source runs 'make check'? >=20 > Spank them as we already do for people building their test as part of=20 > the default target. Oh, so Gentoo has decided that basic QA is another 'poor programming practice' now? --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/4fifH51.tROWAp4BjaQgYVX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkhPaEQACgkQ96zL6DUtXhFoigCgvXbuFBD/oMfQZG7NSQekjF+H 35kAoMy5D+V5YlXXbGjUqgM5CGZEKik2 =VmsK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/4fifH51.tROWAp4BjaQgYVX-- -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list