From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-30789-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1K1jTK-0002IX-4i
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 29 May 2008 14:51:18 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 30D0EE0835;
Thu, 29 May 2008 14:44:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.156])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9CA3E0835
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 29 May 2008 14:44:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id d23so2586861fga.14
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 29 May 2008 07:44:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:received:received:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:from;
bh=T0rJMMODWK8xFUh6BluAEc6eCXqcPeTHecb68ORRo1Q=;
b=trJPxF7AXGdFIdxS+d/kDFkhWxnCgSZbNtAMYp8HKKg4UInVagfzdIxvPDh9Ejx0AnuFXccgPCwhy9ae7sKzUu+qkx30sCbg0NbGx+7SWPZNa2VOhvrgwE46MCDWsX7cOmQNBGDY1sgV0E9WNfg5AUA1VorZfe9DRnzwrj2/EXc=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:from;
b=UmUz+n0AO/1AW1NrUKrk65/harQdn8c0Us6xAiszGQ1vg8d8ZfvhPiXt/4ExvahnPAxppxdGoeLVeMZWQsUmt6Hm3WV+B71u6MK8LzqH8Zkwk0LcyI3sSJJOSRfVcZfvDih6XFdaa0GtRwjQ/K7nlEy2C8BtO87x4S7ZS9E8N1E=
Received: by 10.86.23.17 with SMTP id 17mr3674128fgw.44.1212072251330;
Thu, 29 May 2008 07:44:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ip-85-198-231-102.broker.com.pl ( [85.198.231.102])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d13sm1827819fka.10.2008.05.29.07.44.09
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
Thu, 29 May 2008 07:44:10 -0700 (PDT)
To: Gentoo Development <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 16:40:17 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9
References: <20080529011316.54f0f1f6@sheridan.genone.homeip.net> <483E5338.2010100@gentoo.org>
In-Reply-To: <483E5338.2010100@gentoo.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
boundary="nextPart32765003.uZIt8yzvta";
protocol="application/pgp-signature";
micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200805291640.17853.Arfrever.FTA@gmail.com>
From: Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis <arfrever.fta@gmail.com>
X-Archives-Salt: f4e4ecf4-2c81-4661-8e15-4568c5800c32
X-Archives-Hash: c503772579aad38d9ec5bd0a542d2653
--nextPart32765003.uZIt8yzvta
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
2008-05-29 08:54:48 R=C3=A9mi Cardona napisa=C5=82(a):
> Does portage have a way to report which libraries it is keeping around=20
> because of preserve-libs ?
portageq list_preserved_libs /
=2D-=20
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
--nextPart32765003.uZIt8yzvta
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEABECAAYFAkg+wFEACgkQ+ZiecT68nAMPegCgjXkfMl+oRbK3DPXHrFoW/vw6
hyUAoIa8PMMkepgGoMIVWfJj7tWEpSyI
=NBWy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--nextPart32765003.uZIt8yzvta--
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list