From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JxOly-0007xE-Fr for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 17 May 2008 15:56:38 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 085C8E024B; Sat, 17 May 2008 15:56:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from s15216962.onlinehome-server.info (s15216962.onlinehome-server.info [217.160.22.205]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3958E024B for ; Sat, 17 May 2008 15:56:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by s15216962.onlinehome-server.info (8.13.3/8.13.3) with UUCP id m4HFuREe005975 for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sat, 17 May 2008 17:56:27 +0200 Received: (from weigelt@localhost) by nibiru.metux.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) id m4HFtMOI006463 for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sat, 17 May 2008 17:55:22 +0200 Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 17:55:22 +0200 From: Enrico Weigelt To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: lzma tarball usage Message-ID: <20080517155522.GA17386@nibiru.local> References: <1210166592.19574.10.camel@localhost> <20080507133430.GI15536@gentoo.org> <1210272301.26658.6.camel@localhost> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1210272301.26658.6.camel@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Terror: bin laden, kill bush, Briefbombe, Massenvernichtung, KZ, X-Nazi: Weisse Rasse, Hitlers Wiederauferstehung, 42, X-Antichrist: weg mit schaeuble, ausrotten, heiliger krieg, al quaida, X-Killer: 23, endloesung, Weltuntergang, X-Doof: wer das liest ist doof X-Archives-Salt: 5f463b97-9b48-47d8-a075-40cb1460401f X-Archives-Hash: e83f390931479107919e63d208e3cc1b * Mart Raudsepp schrieb: IMHO, lzma is far from being mature enough from being suited as packaging format for production systems. And actually, I don't see the benefit over well-approved tar+(gz|bz2). So my vote is to NOT use it for gentoo source packages. cu -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Enrico Weigelt == metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce: http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions: http://patches.metux.de/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list