From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Jujdf-0004AU-OF for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 10 May 2008 07:37:03 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3BDAAE0514; Sat, 10 May 2008 07:37:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from amun.cheops.ods.org (amun.cheops.ods.org [82.95.138.191]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0728FE0514 for ; Sat, 10 May 2008 07:37:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tefnut.cheops.ods.org ([2001:888:1022:0:211:24ff:fe37:e46e] helo=gentoo.org) by amun.cheops.ods.org with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Jujdc-0005zM-Hc for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sat, 10 May 2008 09:37:01 +0200 Date: Sat, 10 May 2008 09:36:41 +0200 From: Fabian Groffen To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: lzma tarball usage Message-ID: <20080510073641.GS16108@gentoo.org> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <1210166592.19574.10.camel@localhost> <20080507133430.GI15536@gentoo.org> <200805100332.09349.vapier@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200805100332.09349.vapier@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (Darwin 8.11.0, VIM - Vi IMproved 7.1) Organization: Gentoo Foundation, Inc. X-Content-Scanned: by amun.cheops.ods.org (Exim Exiscan) using SpamAssassin and ClamAV X-Archives-Salt: 3dade51e-dcd9-4c99-b339-8ecdec0cebd0 X-Archives-Hash: 589a306d9ba8030694924023e2f5fb77 On 10-05-2008 03:32:08 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Wednesday 07 May 2008, Fabian Groffen wrote: > > m4, that one gave me some headaches, because lzma-utils required some > > eautoreconf, which introduced a nice cycle. > > must have been a prefix-only bug as the version in the tree never did Ehmm... you're right. Sorry about that. -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list